MedCo goes it alone as it bids to reduce registration costs


Medical reporting: MedCo opens first office

Medical reporting portal MedCo has begun employing its own staff for the first time after the Motor Insurer’s Bureau (MIB) stopped providing managed services.

From today, a number of MIB staff have transferred to MedCo at its new offices in Milton Keynes, while new accountancy, audit and HR providers have also been appointed.

MedCo said its primary aims in implementing these changes were to reduce annual costs and ensure future sustainability.

Despite the capital expenditure of offices and installing IT systems, Legal Futures understands that the MedCo board will shortly announce significant reductions in the annual registration fees for medical reporting organisations.

Since MedCo became operational in 2015, it was always intended that its operations and governance would be reviewed after five years. This review, by independent consultants, was completed in autumn 2020.

Among its recommendations were to appoint independent non-executive directors to the MedCo board with particular individual expertise in operations and finance, which has already been done – John Howells, the chief executive of cash machine network LINK, and accountant Ian Mackie

The review also recommended approaching the MIB with a view to negotiating a new contract. In the end, the MIB decided to stop providing its services from the end of this year.

The progress made in sourcing new arrangements means that the change has been made a month early.

It will not directly affect the MedCo portal or accreditation scheme, as these have never been operated by the MIB.

In a statement, the MedCo board said it “wishes to express its gratitude to the MIB and its staff for the excellent standard of services provided in the past”.




Blog


Beyond the PII premium – rethinking risk

Professional indemnity insurance renewal is often treated as an annual pricing exercise. But it is also a chance to show how effectively you identify, manage and mitigate risk.


The AI governance gap in law firms and why it matters now

A third of law firms are already using AI tools with no formal policy in place to govern how AI gets used, what data goes into it, or who’s accountable when something goes wrong.


Information isn’t oversight – lessons from the PM Law review

The PM Law review’s real findings perhaps point to a failure mode applying to any organisation sitting on scattered risk information.


Loading animation