Many PI law firms yet to decide on post-whiplash reform strategy

Anwar: No wonder that uncertainty pervades the market

Just 18% of claimant personal injury solicitors say their firm has settled on a strategy to deal with next April’s whiplash reforms, a survey has found.

Of the 1,241 responses to a Twitter poll by First4Lawyers, 37% said their firms have not decided on their strategy, while 28% admitted that they have not even thought about it yet. One in six (17%) said they were “getting there”.

As delegates at last month’s PI Futures heard, the government appears determined to introduce the reforms in April 2021, two years after they were first meant to be implemented, although still the pre-action protocol and practice direction governing the new regime have yet to be published, leaving the sector unable to finalise their plans.

Nonetheless, some 41% of solicitors predicted that the reforms would have a major impact on their firms – indeed, it would be ‘business critical’ for 15%. A quarter said they would have ‘minimal’ impact, while for 35% they would make no difference at all.

A more in-depth survey of 65 firms found that nearly half expected small claims to be the preserve of a relatively small number of large firms with the ability to process claims in volume and in a largely automated manner. They also predicted that the courts would become clogged with litigants in person who have not settled their claims inside the new portal.

Most firms that are not planning to handle RTA claims said they would simply reject any that come their way, although some said they would pass the clients on to another firm.

The research also observed that a side-effect of Covid-19 has been that a significant proportion of firms said they had worked out how to handle claims more efficiently, with a quarter saying they felt better placed to cope with the reforms as a result.

A range of behaviours were expected to emerge under the new regime, with respondents in both surveys fairly evenly divided between where the focus will be. There will be an emphasis on the non-injury elements of claims, like credit hire, as well as claims for non-whiplash injuries suffered at the same time.

The Ministry of Justice revealed at PI Futures that it would support a test case so the courts could determine how minor non-whiplash injuries should be handled alongside injuries that are covered by the new system. “This is sure to cause yet more delay and uncertainty,” First4Lawyers noted.

Solicitors anticipated too that claimants might argue for longer periods of recovery from whiplash injuries (compensation will be awarded depending on the length of time symptoms last), while also fighting on to seek an uplift on the damages from the small claims court – although the amount by which judges will be able to increase awards is yet another detail the government has yet to confirm.

Qamar Anwar, managing director of First4Lawyers, says: “The Ministry of Justice has taken delay and dithering to a new level. With less than four months until the Civil Liability Act reforms are meant to come into force, it is unacceptable that we are still waiting for the details of how they will work.

“The government has had years to sort this out but cannot even tell us when the new rules will be published. And yet they expect everyone to be ready to go just a few weeks later.

“It is no wonder that uncertainty pervades the market – 40% of our second survey respondents don’t believe the reforms will even happen in April – and that many firms have not decided exactly what they are going to do in response to the reforms.

“But the important thing to remember is that innocent people are still going to be injured by the negligence of others and it is up to all of us on the claimant side to ensure they have a route to justice if they do not want to take on insurance companies themselves through the new portal.”

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Keeping the conversation going beyond Pride Month

As I reflect on all the celebrations of Pride Month 2024, I ask myself why there remains hesitancy amongst LGBTQ+ staff members about when it comes to being open about their identity in the workplace.

Third-party managed accounts: Your key questions answered

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has given strong indications that it is headed towards greater restrictions on law firms when it comes to handling client money.

Understanding vicarious trauma in the legal workplace

Vicarious trauma can happen to anyone who works with clients who have experienced trauma such as domestic or other violence, child abuse, sexual assault, torture or being a refugee.

Loading animation