LSB chief questions need for training contract and pupillage, and pushes for faster ABS process


Kenny: remarkable innovation by traditional law firms

A training regime whose only specification is what a newly-qualified lawyer should be able to offer on day one is the kind of deregulation the Legal Education and Training Review (LETR) should be considering, according to the chief executive of the Legal Services Board (LSB).

Meanwhile, Chris Kenny urged the speeding up of alternative business structure (ABS) approvals and predicted the law would have to be reformed “sooner or later” to streamline the application process now that fear of ABS applicants had subsided.

He praised traditional law firms for “remarkable innovation” to meet the challenge of ABS new entrants.

Mr Kenny suggested an outcomes-focused approach to training at a breakfast roundtable on the future of legal services held by the Office of Fair Trading following its recent report on the impact of the Legal Services Act.

The report said pupillage training might be limiting access to the market, and Mr Kenny argued that the question should be asked as to whether regulators should be involved in matters of pupillage and training contracts at all.

“As an alternative, one could specify ‘day one’ outcomes when a lawyer starts serving the public, but leave it to the market to decide on the best way to bring people to ensure that those competence levels were in place. I hope that is the kind of debate which the LETR will trigger.”

The LETR was meant to have reported by the end of 2012, but will now not do so before May, it was announced recently.

He described delays in the ABS approval process as “growing pains” and blamed the Legal Services Act’s cautious approach, saying: “They are also a consequence of the over-specification in the 2007 Act – we are now at a stage where we no longer need to regard ABS applicants as very dangerous genetically modified organisms to be handled by scientists in white coats at Porton Down only after five years of clearance by an ethical committee. The legislation will need to catch up with that reality sooner rather than later.”

Mr Kenny welcomed the recent spurt of ABS approvals by the Solicitors Regulation Authority, while highlighting as “good practice to reflect on” the simplicity of the Council for Licensed Conveyancers’ ABS application form and clear online guidance.

Speeding up the approvals process was “essential, not only to ensure that new entrants can arrive in the market, but also to maintain the current remarkable innovation driven by some existing non-ABS firms responding to the challenge of new entrants.

“This has been quite as important as that which the new entrants have brought themselves – and indeed, that innovation was the point of the reform, rather than it being simply a numbers game,” he said.

Tags:




    Readers Comments

  • Adequacy rules ok! We have a judicial system which is the envy of the world, and it is proposed that we replace it with a system that is “good enough”.
    What place does the future of the rule of law have in Mr. Kenny’s observations? De-regulate, de-construct and let the market rule? Where will the ballast be when socio-political crisises strike? Such short-termism is indefensible.
    The LETR needs to address how to produce a modern, progressive legal work-force. It should not be considering ways to throw the baby out with the bathwater.


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

Our latest special report, produced in association with Temple Legal Protection, looks at the role of after-the-event (ATE) insurance in commercial litigation post-LASPO. We are at a time when insurers, solicitors, clients and litigation funders work ever more closely to create funding packages that work for all of them, with conditional fee and even damages-based agreements now part of many law firms’ armoury.

Blog

18 October 2019

Will your staff have confidence in your compliance officers?

The introduction of the SRA Standards and Regulations on 25 November 2019 will see new issues coming into focus for you and your firms over the reporting of serious breaches to the SRA.

Read More

Loading animation