LSB chief executive steps down after less than year in post


Westwood: Resignation tendered

The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to be without a permanent chief executive as well as chair after announcing yesterday that Craig Westwood is to leave the oversight regulator.

Mr Westwood only joined last August from the Electoral Commission but is to leave soon after tendering his resignation this week, citing personal considerations.

Richard Orpin, the LSB’s director of regulation and policy, will stand in as interim chief executive, as he did in the months before Mr Westwood replaced Matthew Hill, with general counsel Danielle Viall also taking on the role of interim deputy CEO.

It was only in March that the then LSB chair, Alan Kershaw, stood down from the role less than halfway through his term, again citing personal reasons. The board’s senior independent director, Catherine Brown, is the interim chair and has been appointed until the end of the year.

Ms Brown said: “On behalf of the board and all of us at the LSB, I want to thank Craig for his leadership during his time as chief executive.

“Over a demanding year, he has led the organisation through significant developments. This included launching our consultation on the role of regulation in strengthening ethical standards in the profession. We also initiated enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority following the £60m client money loss at Axiom Ince.

“Craig will leave the LSB in a strong position to continue delivering effective regulation in the public interest. We wish him all the best for the future.”

During his time in post, Mr Westwood was particularly outspoken on diversity in the profession, describing progress to improve it as “too slow – in particular, the pace of change in closing progression gaps at senior levels”, and subsequently saying that the LSB had “a duty to act”.




Blog


Beyond the PII premium – rethinking risk

Professional indemnity insurance renewal is often treated as an annual pricing exercise. But it is also a chance to show how effectively you identify, manage and mitigate risk.


The AI governance gap in law firms and why it matters now

A third of law firms are already using AI tools with no formal policy in place to govern how AI gets used, what data goes into it, or who’s accountable when something goes wrong.


Information isn’t oversight – lessons from the PM Law review

The PM Law review’s real findings perhaps point to a failure mode applying to any organisation sitting on scattered risk information.


Loading animation