Lord Chief backs “smartphone justice” but not so keen on AI

Gauke: We can harness the power of big data

There is no reason why litigants could not access the courts on their smartphones in the future, the Lord Chief Justice said yesterday, although he questioned the extent to which artificial intelligence would handle judicial tasks.

Lord Burnett said that when large numbers of people, “and particularly those on low incomes”, do not have effective access to justice, the law could not ignore the digital revolution.

In an opening address to a ground-breaking international forum on online courts – organised in London yesterday by HM Courts and Tribunals Service and the Society for Computers and Law – he said litigants with small claims wanted and expected a swift and inexpensive answer.

“If the courts cannot provide that, alternative dispute resolution mechanisms will develop which can. And we owe it to those who challenge government decisions in tribunals to make the task as simple as we can, in practical and procedural terms, and provide answers swiftly.”

Lord Burnett argued that the justice system had to be prepared for what might appear to be radical change, but could soon become the norm.

He cited the 2017 book Digital Justice, which postulated the building of a ‘smartphone court’.

“But why not? There is no reason why our forms, processes, and perhaps even some hearings should not be optimised for smartphones giving litigants effective access to justice from the palm of their hand.

“That facility is being developed in England and Wales. There is no reason why our online courts and justice systems cannot deliver effective and accessible justice direct to the citizen. Both the Lord Chancellor and I are in agreement on this.”

Lord Burnett said he expected the process of digitalisation to move into the next stage of online facilitation and evaluation in some areas.

“There is no reason why it should not. It is very much the model already used for dispute resolution by the Financial Services Ombudsman.”

He acknowledged that there would have to be a debate about the greater use of AI during the judicial processes.

“AI is developing in the world of legal advice. It will be able to give a preliminary indication of the legal merits of a claim. There is every reason to suppose that it will develop to be useful in giving indicative decisions and maybe help facilitate early settlement.

“There are those who suggest that AI, buttressed with careful safeguards, could perform some, if not all judicial functions.

“I have my doubts but would not discourage debate. AI, however, is one area where, while much has been done, we are in the foothills, rather than the uplands, of understanding how and where it can properly be utilised.”

In his speech to the forum, Lord Chancellor David Gauke said technology was a way simplify, streamline, and put the citizen in the driving seat of the justice system.

“This will allow us to open up our justice system, make it more accessible, and put power back into the hands of the people using it, including simpler, faster routes to resolving disputes that are clear and easy to use – recognising that people often want their problem solved rapidly and satisfactorily more than they want their ‘day in court’.

“It will remove the unnecessary costs of complexity, duplication, error and waste – so that people are not priced out of justice and – for example – that lawyers are paid and used for their legal advice and skill, not simply to navigate the system”.

With easily accessible data and information, he added “everyone can make informed decisions, and we can harness the power of big data in support of justice”.

The forum is co-chaired by legal technology guru and Society of Computers and Law president Professor Richard Susskind, who told the delegates from more than 20 jurisdictions that figures showed how more people now have access to the internet (more than 50%), than access to justice – 43%, according to the OECD.

Interested in this topic? Check out our Civil Litigation Conference, covering court modernisation, new technologies, predictive algorithms and more

Legal Futures Civil Litigation Conference, 19 March 2019

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Microsoft 365’s dirty little secret

Microsoft 365 (formerly called Office 365) is one of the most widely used cloud services in the world, controlling around 48% of the market share for major office suites.

A new route to practice rights for chartered legal executives

Following approval from the Legal Services Board in May 2022, CILEx Regulation has launched an alternative route for chartered legal executives to obtain independent practice rights.

NFTs, the courts and the role of injunctions

In May, news broke that a non-fungible token was the subject of a successful injunction made by the Singapore High Court. The NFT in question is part of the very valuable Bored Ape Yacht Club series.

Loading animation