Listing law firms urged to learn lessons of accountancy consolidators

Noyce: legal services market is screaming out for further consolidation

Noyce: legal services market is screaming out for further consolidation

Gateley and other law firms looking to go public must show they can avoid the costly mistakes the accountancy consolidators made when tried stock market listings, a leading commentator has warned.

Peter Noyce, head of professional services at accountants Menzies, said Gateley CEO Michael Ward “certainly gives the impression that there is structured thinking behind the move” when he described the catalysts for value creation as being to “acquire, incentivise, differentiate and, where sensible, diversify”.

Mr Noyce said: “Fifteen years ago, the accountancy consolidators overpaid when acquiring small accountancy practices. This, combined with ineffective integration of the new practices, increased their costs and ultimately led to unserviceable debt levels…

“The legal and accountancy sectors will watch with interest the multiples that Gateleys uses in its acquisitions. It will be a far cry from the traditional merger of two partnerships, where business valuation is a private matter. Paying over the odds will not only threaten their business model, but also set an unrealistic bar for the next acquisition.

“The legal services market is screaming out for further consolidation, but asset prices must be realistic.”

Speaking to Legal Futures last week, Mr Ward said a key issue to address with potential investors was that “the people who have gone before in professional services businesses haven’t done so well”. He said Gateley had looked at these forerunners “and addressed all the issues” they raised.

Mr Noyce explained that it was not the AIM model that caused the accountancy consolidators problems, but rather how they implemented their strategies.

The cost base proved to be too high, and when coupled with reducing revenues, along with impairment reviews of goodwill values being carried, “investors and banks began to get concerned”, he said.

They were unable to absorb acquisitions in such a way as to make the combined entity more profitable than the standalone practices, Mr Noyce said, suggesting that the consolidators may have simply become too big “with a focus on top line rather than profit”. Also, regional firms becoming part of a national organisation “often did not fit”.

Mr Noyce said that to convince investors, Gateley will need to follow through its stated strategy “so that there are no surprises”.

He added: “The management team should not underestimate the external reporting that will be required. The profit warnings that Tenon gave out regularly, and accounting errors also do not give confidence in the operation. Again, management control and information will need to be tight and reliable.

“The culture that has made them successful should continue to be the cornerstone and acquisitions should be embraced by all; the idea of Gateley staff being involved in ownership and therefore more inclined to embrace their new colleagues and work for the collective good will assist.”

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Our latest special report, produced in association with Temple Legal Protection, looks at the role of after-the-event (ATE) insurance in commercial litigation post-LASPO. We are at a time when insurers, solicitors, clients and litigation funders work ever more closely to create funding packages that work for all of them, with conditional fee and even damages-based agreements now part of many law firms’ armoury.


16 October 2019

The new SRA accounts rules – a checklist for compliant software

There are a number of changes to the accounts rules from 25 November, which law firm managers and compliance officers will need to take into account in order for their firms not to be in breach.

Read More

Loading animation