Listed law firm sees value soar by £10m as it targets regional acquisition


Foulston: Market credibility

The market capitalisation of Rosenblatt, which last week became the fourth law firm to go public, has already risen by £10m on the back of a strong start to trading.

Having listed at 95p, the share price hit a high of 117p earlier this week and closed yesterday at 113p, giving the City firm a market capitalisation of £88m.

Chief executive Nicola Foulston told Legal Futures that the share price had risen because institutions wanted to complete their shareholdings but there were not enough sellers.

Investors were getting used to listed law firms, she added, suggesting that there were more coming to market.

The fact that she – a successful businesswoman – was at the helm also gave the business credibility, she said.

She continued that the listing had provoked an “outstanding reaction”, with law firms, teams and individuals approaching her with a view to joining the practice.

Rosenblatt has put aside up to £7m from the capital it has raised for acquisitions, and Ms Foulston confirmed that these will include complementary non-legal services. However, she said the initial focus was on acquiring high-end litigation practices.

She also revealed that the pressure on fees in corporate transactions meant that Rosenblatt was looking for a regional acquisition to act as a lower-cost centre for such work.

Though some of the new capital has been earmarked to fund more litigation in-house, Ms Foulston said the plan over the 18 months was to create a standalone litigation funder as part of the Rosenblatt group.

“We want to create a track record before looking to raise much more money,” she said. There was, she continued, a lot more understanding and appetite among investors for litigation funding – aided by the success of Burford Capital – but “also an expectation that their returns will continue”.

The reality was that, as more competition entered the market, the returns recorded by Buford were likely to fall, she said.

“I believe [in a model] where the underlying core business is a law firm that feeds day-to-day returns, and the litigation funding piece sits on top of that for exponential returns.”




Blog


Why law firms are getting AI supervision wrong

The profession’s response to AI supervision failures misunderstands the nature of LLM output – there needs to be for a shift in the culture.


Beyond the PII premium – rethinking risk

Professional indemnity insurance renewal is often treated as an annual pricing exercise. But it is also a chance to show how effectively you identify, manage and mitigate risk.


The AI governance gap in law firms and why it matters now

A third of law firms are already using AI tools with no formal policy in place to govern how AI gets used, what data goes into it, or who’s accountable when something goes wrong.


Loading animation