Licensed conveyancers to embrace third-party managed accounts

Blandy: Positive step

A revised accounts code that expressly allows firms of licensed conveyaners to use third-party managed accounts (TPMAs) has been approved by the Legal Services Board.

The new Council for Licensed Conveyancers (CLC) code, which will come into force on 30 September, also contains simpler, more targeted requirements to make it simpler to understand, and allow firms to deal more easily with aged balances up to £50 where they are unable to identify the rightful recipient.

In its application to the LSB, the CLC wrote: “Less prescriptive rules can lead to lower costs and higher efficiency savings… [and] mean that practices will need to properly assess the needs of their clients and how they ensure compliance rather than relying on detailed rules which may become a tick-box exercise.”

Having the option to not use a client account “could enable a practice to reallocate resources to focus on the quality and competitiveness of its services”.

CLC firms can only use TPMAs regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, and firms must also be authorised by the CLC to enter arrangements with particular TPMA providers.

Firms must ensure that the decision to use a TPMA, and the TPMA provider selected, is “appropriate in the circumstances of each case”.

The Legal Services Board welcomed the move on TPMAs, noting that the Solicitors Regulation Authority and CILEx Regulation have also issued rules and/or guidance on their use.

The board said it concluded back in 2015 that TPMAs “can benefit consumers by enhancing the security of client money (with the appropriate safeguards in place), providing a wider choice of payment arrangements and greater transparency of process”.

For practitioners, potential benefits included lower compensation fund contributions and lower professional indemnity insurance premiums, “which could in turn result in benefits to consumers if these savings are passed on”.

Simon Blandy, director of regulatory standards at the CLC, said: “This is a positive step towards removing unnecessary detail in favour of an emphasis on the most important aspects of the proper management of client money and ensuring protection of the client’s interests.”

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Automated justice: striking the balance in injury claims

No professional sector is immune from automation – even the law. However, the adoption of automated systems to settle routine injury claims raises a number of important ethical questions.

Conveyancers: are you afraid of outsourcing?

For many years, outsourcing has been seen as a bit of a scary prospect within the conveyancing sector. But thanks to the stamp duty holiday, conveyancers are now realising some of the many benefits.

You win some, you lose some – class actions post Google

In November, Google received two court rulings, through which it both closed and opened the door to class actions against it. So what do the decisions mean for future class actions?

Loading animation