Licensed conveyancers review insurance scheme as market hardens


Insurance: Review after five years of the open market

The Council for Licensed Conveyancers (CLC) has announced a review of its professional indemnity insurance arrangements in light of a hardening market for cover.

In 2016, the CLC moved from a master policy to the open market, underpinned by a participating insurers agreement (PIA), and it said this has achieved the principal aim of introducing competition.

But, in a call for evidence about the operation of the PIA ahead of a consultation later this year, the regulator said the hardening insurance market “has placed strain onto the entire system”.

It explained: “Over recent years we have seen examples of firms being refused cover because of work carried out in the past even if any notified circumstances do not proceed or they no longer undertake that type of work.

“In such instances, insurers seem happier to shoulder the risk in run-off rather than continue to work with an ongoing business.

“We expect that these difficulties will pass and that the market will return to a more stable and sustainable level to the benefit of the public and consumer interest.”

The CLC said some new firms and those transferring from the Solicitors Regulation Authority have found it difficult to secure quotes “in a timely way”.

It added: “This has even been the case when firms moving between regulators are not changing the services they provide, nor their personnel or business model.

“This could be stifling innovation and diversity of provision and so reducing consumer choice.”

This represented a “quasi-regulatory barrier” to market entry and participation given that cover was mandatory.

The PIA provides for a minimum level of cover of £2m for every claim and integrates run-off cover for closing firms so that no premium is payable at the point of closure, with an aggregate of £2m cover for the six-year period.




Blog


Linklaters’ chief growth officer takes the ‘blank sheet’ challenge

Posted by Scott Jones, deputy editor of Legal Futures As LegalTechTalk gets underway today, we invite our third and final lawyer to take the ‘blank sheet’ challenge – sketching out their dream law firm with the freedom to start again from… Read More


The ‘blank sheet’ challenge, part 2 – what would you do differently?

In the second part of this blog series, Shainul Kassam, managing director of small London firm Fortune Law, sets out how she would set up a law firm now.


The ‘blank sheet’ challenge – what would you do differently?

The law is all about precedent and what came before. But imagine you had a blank sheet of paper and could start from scratch. What would you do differently? What would stay the same?


Loading animation