Licensed conveyancers face scrutiny over complaints and conflicts of interest


Kumar: “signposting to LeO part of review”

The Council for Licensed Conveyancers (CLC) is to investigate its members’ handling of complaints and their performance in managing conflicts of interest when acting for buyer and seller in property transactions.

Announcing that it was launching two ‘thematic reviews’, starting immediately, the CLC said they would be based not only on information provided by licensed conveyancers in their annual regulatory returns, but also on complaints information supplied by the Legal Ombudsman (LeO).

The findings will be presented to the CLC’s council with recommendations by the end of the year. Despite the tight timetable, the CLC explained the reviews were part of a “rolling programme” and that it was “good practice to review key areas periodically”.

The research will include “targeted surveys” of the CLC’s regulated community. The review of complaints handling will focus on whether licensed conveyancers have been properly ‘signposting’ complaints options to clients – such as their right to complain to LeO.

The other review will include the performance of CLC members in managing conflicts relating to acting for both sides in property transactions in a changing marketplace.

CLC chief executive, Sheila Kumar, said: “The CLC’s regulatory regime has secured extremely high levels of risk management and licensed conveyancers have an enviable reputation in the legal sector.

“Our regulatory arrangements for entities acting for both the buyer and the seller of a property have been in place for some time and are well proven. It is good regulatory practice to review such arrangements periodically as part of a rolling programme and in the light of market developments.”

“Following work with [LeO] we now have access to very rich data about the complaints that reach them from the clients of all those we regulate. Happily these are few in number but… we note that LeO has raised general issues across the legal sector relating to the signposting of LeO to consumers.

“We also want to take the opportunity of roadshows that we are holding in the last quarter of the year to discuss complaints handling issues with licensed conveyancers.”

 

 




Blog


Which legal AI will still matter in 12 months?

Four years ago, when senior partners asked me which legal AI they should buy, I would have walked them through a vendor comparison. Now I tell them the question is wrong.


Supreme Court redraws line between member and employee in LLPs

For anyone advising professional services firms on LLP structuring, and of course for those in LLPs themselves, last week’s Supreme Court ruling is an essential read.


Charting a new course for publicly funded legal services

The current Legal Aid Agency model is inherently flawed and it goes beyond mere data breaches – it cannot innovatively respond to increasing challenges.


Loading animation