Licensed conveyancers attack regulator’s move into litigation and advocacy


Mulroy: positive step

Licensed conveyancers have spoken out against their regulatory body’s bid to expand its regulatory reach to litigation and advocacy services.

However, a survey of its members by the Society of Licensed Conveyancers (SLC) showed strong support for the Council for Licensed Conveyancers (CLC) looking to regulate will-writing and estate administration should they become reserved legal activities.

In April the Legal Services Board rejected the CLC’s application to regulate litigation and advocacy, but left the door open to a future application, which the CLC is planning. Nearly two-thirds (64%) of the 68 respondents to the SLC survey opposed this, while 76% said they did not believe that the income generated by their practising fees should be used to fund it.

However, 87% of respondents supported an expansion into will-writing and estate administration; the CLC can already authorise practitioners to undertake probate work.

SLC chairman Simon Law said: “We took the decision to conduct our own survey as it had become clear that a number of our members were not wholly in support of the CLC’s plans to expand its regulatory role. The CLC has been pushing hard to secure approval from the Legal Services Board to expand into areas such as litigation and advocacy. However, it appears there is little support from the licensed conveyancer community for it to actually achieve this – which leads us to question where the impetus for moving into these areas is coming from.

“The CLC’s income is derived from regulating licensed conveyancers, yet the findings from our survey clearly indicate that the majority are not happy to be funding expansion into areas which they do not feel the CLC should be venturing into. This is something that needs to be addressed.”

In a statement, the CLC said it “remains committed to specialising in what it does best: conveyancing, probate and those other ‘consumer’ legal services that people use on a relatively regular basis. The application to regulate litigation and advocacy has not changed that: rather, we want our existing licence holders to have the opportunity to broaden their skill sets and to work within those specialist areas.

“With the introduction of alternative business structures (ABS) we have recently licensed a number of large organisations in the areas of conveyancing and probate, many of whom offer a range of other legal and property services.

June Mulroy, interim chief executive of the CLC, said: “As an innovative and independent regulator we are looking to the future and need to be responsive to the changes that are taking place in the legal services market and the opportunities that they present. It would be remiss of us as an organisation not to assess those opportunities to see if we can bring our expertise as a regulator to bear in other specialist areas.

“We see this as a positive step that in the longer term will benefit our regulated community as a whole as they would be able to extend their scope and range of regulated services to the public.”

 




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


What challenges will the Bar face in the next five years?

As we look towards the end of 2021 and at how the Bar has adapted to the harsh realities of the pandemic, the question beckons as to what the future holds.


The rise of cyber-criminal threat for law firms since Covid-19

The global coronavirus pandemic, and the rise in people working from home, has unfortunately provoked a growth in cyber-crime. The UK government estimates that the cost of cyber-crime is £27bn per annum.


How to ensure your ATE cover is adequate security for costs

When does an after-the-event insurance policy provide adequate security for a defendant’s costs? The short answer is that it very much depends on the wording of the particular policy.


Loading animation