LeO urges right to redress for clients of unregulated legal providers so they can better compete


Green: improving balance of performance

Green: improving balance of performance

The government review of the Legal Services Act needs to give clients of unregulated providers access to the Legal Ombudsman (LeO) so as to close off a “competitive advantage” enjoyed by those that are regulated, the complaints body said this week.

LeO will also consider offering new forms of dispute resolution, according to its draft 2016-17 strategy, which is now out for consultation.

Steve Green, chair of the Office for Legal Complaints – the body that oversees LeO – said: “We remain concerned at the absence of redress for consumers who choose to obtain legal services from unregulated businesses.

“It cannot be right that that the absence of redress has the ability to act as a competitive advantage to legal businesses which sit within the regulated part of the sector. We hope that the opportunity to correct that imbalance will be taken in any future re-visiting of the Legal Services Act.”

Last year, Lord Chancellor Michael Gove committed to a review of the Act during the current Parliament.

The strategy said LeO’s overall goals for the next year were to continue to improve efficiency, implement changes to its jurisdiction, help create an improved complaints handling system, and “disseminate what we have learned more widely”.

Among the ways it planned to achieve these objectives were considering the options for development of alternative dispute services, “which could include consideration of methods of resolution which we do not currently offer (for example mediation and first-tier complaint support).

The strategy also made it clear that work on accepting complaints from non-client third parties would continue. Also on the agenda were how LeO could help lawyers and consumers when complaints are made prematurely, a review of its policy on publicising ombudsman decisions, and consideration of its case fee structure.

Mr Green added: “We believe that there is still more that can be done in the coming year to build upon our achievements and intend to sustain the pace of our change and improvement. For example, this consultation document shows how we intend to improve the balance of our performance between completing investigations as in a timely manner as possible whilst providing the highest-possible quality.”




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


GEO – the impact of AI on digital marketing for law firms

GEO represents the biggest change in online business generation that I can remember. You cannot afford to stick with the same old engine optimisation techniques.


What the law can learn from fintech’s onboarding revolution

Client onboarding has always been slow. It’s not just about the paperwork and manual workflows; it’s also about those long AML checks and verifications.


Civil enforcement – progress at last with CJC report

‘When do I get my money?’ is a question that litigators acting for successful parties are used to fielding. The value of judgments is of course in the recovery made.


Loading animation