LeO upholds more complaints of poor service by lawyers


Goldwag: Mixed performance

The Legal Ombudsman (LeO) was more likely to make a finding of poor service against a lawyer than not in 2018/19, reversing the trend of previous years, its annual report has shown.

The report said the key issues LeO faced in the year have been the combined impact of three factors on performance against KPIs.

These were its investment in modernisation “and the time it has taken for fundamental changes to bed in; significant pressures on operational staffing arising from higher than anticipated staff turnover in a highly competitive recruitment market and high levels of staff sickness; and variability in performance and productivity with existing resource”.

LeO closed 6,206 cases in the year to 31 March 2019, with 41% going through to a decision by an ombudsman rather than an agreed outcome between the parties. This was significantly higher than the 33% in the previous year, which LeO said reflected the service clearing its backlog of older cases, “more of which went all the way to the end of our process”.

Where cases did go to an ombudsman’s decision, typically in previous years LeO found the service provided was of a reasonable standard in a majority of cases (53% and 54% in the past two years). However, in 2018/19, it found the service provided was not reasonable in 54% of cases.

Also in previous years, LeO awarded no remedy in a similar majority of cases where poor service was found, but that dropped to 44% in 2019/19.

“The proportion of cases that received a fee-related remedy or a non-financial remedy stayed broadly the same as in previous years, but we awarded a higher proportion of financial remedies (40%) than we have in the last two years.”

As in previous years, residential conveyancing (25%), personal injury (14%), family law (13%), wills and probate (12%) and litigation (10%) were the main practice areas generating complaints.

Delay/failure to progress, failure to advise, poor communication and cost were the main causes, although there was a drop in failure to follow instructions as a reason for complaint.

LeO exceeded its 26% target for closing cases within 90 days, but missed the targets for closing cases within 180 and 365 days, which it attributed to a focus on “legacy” cases which were accepted for investigation in 2017-18 under its previous case management system.

“Under our new case management system and operating process, our ability to progress cases in line with our timeliness KPIs is significantly improved.”

LeO also exceeded its 85% target for customer satisfaction with the service, hitting 92%.

But the cost per unit of cases – LeO’s budget divided by the number of cases closed – of £1,926 not only exceeded the previous year’s figure of £1,787 but also widened the gap to the target of £1,580 per case.

LeO spent £11.9m on dealing with legal complaints in 2018/19, £1m more than the year before, but nearly £1m less than budgeted.

“Our underspend this year reflects the impact of high staff turnover in year and the need to control unit cost in the medium term,” the report said.

We revealed earlier this month that LeO was struggling with case closure targets amid high staff turnover – the report said it had a staff turnover rate of 18.5%, while the average days per employee lost to sickness was nearly 12, both well above the public sector average.

During 2018-19, the number of complaints against lawyers that were accepted for investigation fell from 7,527 the previous year to just 4,022.

The report said: “This change can be attributed to our new business process which was designed to deal with legacy cases from our previous case management system.

“Our new customer assessment tool, launched in 2018-19, has also enabled people to come to us at the right time with the types of issues we can help them with, and has given them a better understanding of the complaints system.”

Wanda Goldwag, chair of the Office for Legal Complaints – which oversees the operation of LeO – said in her introduction to the report: “Although performance against our new KPIs has improved during 2018-19, it remains mixed; in 2019-20 we must achieve consistent and sustainable performance.

“We have been particularly concerned by the lower than planned level of output, and the impact this has had on our unit cost KPI.

“The OLC is under no illusion about the scale of the task to deliver sustained improvement in performance and recognises that it will take time to address our current challenges, particularly if case numbers and complexity continue to increase in the legal jurisdiction.”

Rebecca Marsh, the chief ombudsman and chief executive, wrote that she was pleased with the progress LeO has made, resulting in “a more stable organisation, which will enable us to deliver a better quality service to our customers”.

She continued: “There is much more work to be done for us to achieve a sustained and consistent level of high performance.

“Customer experience has improved in terms of the quality and timeliness of investigations, particularly with the removal of waits for ombudsman decisions, but the wait time for cases to be assessed is still too long.

“There is still a way to go to meet the levels of service that people expect from the Legal Ombudsman.”




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

Our latest special report, produced in association with Temple Legal Protection, looks at the role of after-the-event (ATE) insurance in commercial litigation post-LASPO. We are at a time when insurers, solicitors, clients and litigation funders work ever more closely to create funding packages that work for all of them, with conditional fee and even damages-based agreements now part of many law firms’ armoury.

Blog

10 December 2019

Is your website lost in the desert?

Having a website is like advertising on a billboard in the middle of the desert – it’s pretty useless unless people are driving past to see it. It’s exactly the same with cyberspace.

Read More

Loading animation