“Our legal services will stay on top”, minister declares in face of growing threat of competition post-Brexit

Heald: very strong position for the future

Justice minister Sir Oliver Heald has struck a bullish tone of defiance in response to concerns that Germany and the Netherlands are creating English-language commercial courts to compete with the UK for disputes post Brexit.

Sir Oliver rejected a suggestion that the appeal of the UK’s legal system would “fall down the rankings” after leaving the EU, saying: “We are a world brand in this area, and we can go out and sell. Our services are excellent, which is well understood internationally.”

But giving evidence recently to the justice sub-committee of the House of Lords’ EU select committee, he said: “I do not think that we should be too shy about our legal services; they are world class. We are also doing quite a lot to make it not just the best legal system in the world but the most modern.”

Lord Cromwell said evidence from other witnesses before the committee had expressed anxiety that the uncertainty of Brexit would encourage people to take elsewhere business that currently comes to London: “Holland, Germany, Paris, Geneva, Stockholm, New York and Singapore have all been mentioned to us in evidence as possible cases.”

Highlighting the courts being set up by the Dutch and Germans, he also quoted the Law Society’s written evidence, which said: “Foreign businesses are already voicing concerns around recognition and enforcement of English judgments or choosing of English law to govern the disputes. If this continues it will be detrimental to the legal services sector in England Wales and the economic contribution it makes to the UK economy.”

In response, Sir Oliver said 40% of commercial contracts globally were written in English law.

“We have a lot of competition from other countries, particularly the USA. Having said that, we have excellent judges who are internationally renowned and seen as incorruptible, and our reach, as I was just discussing, goes into almost every aspect of international law.

“All these things mean that we have a very strong position for the future and will have every opportunity to improve our position. We are the world leader in commercial arbitration, for example, so my feeling is that we have a very strong sector here… My feeling is that although we need to reach a sensible agreement, we should not be too nervous about our future.

“The Secretary of State for Exiting the EU, David Davis, is fully aware of the importance of this sector. The legal world is part of the Global Britain strategy, and we will have a summit in the spring where leading figures in the law will explain for the world exactly what we have to offer.”

During the evidence session – which focused on the consequences for civil justice co-operation of Brexit – Sir Oliver gave away little about the government’s approach to the Brussels conventions, except to emphasise that it appreciated their importance.

“It is certainly very high in the minds of government. It is true that a lot of the resonance of this is for ordinary people who have ordinary concerns of the sort you describe [such as car accidents in and buying products from Europe], but it is also important for business, because doing business with a proper legal underpinning of certainty about how legal matters will be tackled is very important for business.

“It is important for everybody; it is important in the commercial sector and for individuals. That is why we have had all the meetings that we have had and why we have worked very closely with DExEU on this. The Secretary of State has made it clear that these issues will be part of the negotiations.”

Non-lawyer Lord Judd said that the committee’s hearings had changed his mind about lawyers. “I think that their wisdom and clarity are vital for a civilised society—the better ones. It seems to me that the problem that we will face in negotiating the treaty will be that it will happen very much in the context of a very lively political debate both in the European Union and in Britain.

“The things that are being said in a completely different context in Britain will have a political impact on those negotiations, and your reasonableness as a lawyer, which I admire, is not necessarily going to make headway, because there will be so much animosity about the context in which the treaty is being negotiated.”

Sir Oliver replied: “I have always thought that people do not like lawyers until they need one. I am sure that in reaching an agreement with the EU, lawyers will play an important part, as they have on numerous previous occasions when it was necessary.”

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Keeping the conversation going beyond Pride Month

As I reflect on all the celebrations of Pride Month 2024, I ask myself why there remains hesitancy amongst LGBTQ+ staff members about when it comes to being open about their identity in the workplace.

Third-party managed accounts: Your key questions answered

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has given strong indications that it is headed towards greater restrictions on law firms when it comes to handling client money.

Understanding vicarious trauma in the legal workplace

Vicarious trauma can happen to anyone who works with clients who have experienced trauma such as domestic or other violence, child abuse, sexual assault, torture or being a refugee.

Loading animation