Legal regulators slammed for “lacking expertise” on comparison data


Matcham: Open-sourcing data

Lawyer data already in the public domain cannot easily be adapted to help consumers choose a lawyer, mainly due to failings by legal regulators, according to research.

Reasons included that regulators lack technical expertise and were not collecting certain data that was useful for making comparisons.

Researchers claimed a specific problem was that the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) had refused a request to supply regulatory information in a usable format.

In general there was a lack of standardisation and a “disjointed ecosystem of data management and collaboration” between the government and the main industry-funded legal regulators, such as the SRA, the Bar Standards Board, and CILEx Regulation, they concluded.

The research was commissioned by Legal Utopia – an app for consumers and SMEs to diagnose and get guidance on their legal problems – and carried out in collaboration with the University of Aberdeen, with support from Scottish non-profit innovation centre The Data Lab.

In launching the consumer version of the app in May, Legal Utopia attempted to synchronise its own lawyer search service with that of the SRA, but could only find four ‘quality indicators’ believed helpful to consumers that existed in both, namely (in order of what influence): duration of authorisation as a firm, number of practice fields, website availability and location.

The researchers said they had tried in vain to rank the importance of 10 quality indicators, including regulatory history and payment options, but could not do so due to “the lack of regulator engagement and poor data landscape”.

They also said that, in April 2021, they had tried to obtain a portable copy of the SRA’s database of the regulatory history of solicitors, which was already in the public domain and published on the SRA’s own register.

But the request was declined, which “obstructed the ability to introduce regulatory history as an element of this study”.

The frustrated researchers argued that “barriers” existed, including limitations on data access, weak data standardisation and poor “technical expertise amongst lawyer-specific regulators”.

Legal Utopia, which sells subscriptions to individuals and businesses, condemned the SRA for failing to collect key data on its 10,000 regulated law firms.

Perceived weaknesses included a lack of available information on trading history or turnover, cyber-security or insurance credentials, plus “no attribution of individual solicitors or lawyers that worked for, or with, an SRA entity”.

However, the company said the study indicated there was hope for the future, in that an ongoing decline in the number of law firms in recent years, combined with a growth in user data from Legal Utopia’s mobile app, made it more likely a “comparison solution” would be found.

Fraser Matcham, the app’s founder and chief problem solver, said: “This study is both insightful and unique in its proposal to compute the importance of quality indicators.

“[It] highlights what could be possible in future with greater cross-regulator collaboration and action on the present data landscape, as well as what industry is able to produce even with minimal data access.

“Our hope by open-sourcing our data, modelling, and programming materials produced by this study is to highlight and encourage the modern, ambitious methods to consumer and business shopping of legal services.”




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Should the SRA introduce tougher sanctions for AML breaches?

We have recently seen the Solicitors Regulation Authority fining law firms across England and Wales over a lack of proper anti-money laundering policies and procedures.


EHCPs and the uphill struggle for justice

The staggering truth behind the education system supporting children with special education needs and disabilities is that 80% of SEND children don’t receive the regular in-school support they need.


How to practise in Australia without re-qualifying

Those of you looking for a lateral career shift will be encouraged by the UK government’s announcement in June that UK lawyers will be allowed to practise in Australia without having to requalify


Loading animation