Leading firm faces class action over treatment of female lawyers returning from maternity leave


MoFo: Confident firm will be vindicated

US-based international law firm Morrison & Foerster (MoFo) is facing a $100m (£73m) class action over claims that it discriminates against female staff when they return to work after childbirth.

Three female associates currently employed at the firm alleged that MoFo subjected them and other female staff to lower pay, delayed advancement, lack of professional development opportunities, higher standards and limited access to meaningful work.

They said discriminatory policies and practices were created and implemented by MoFo’s predominantly-male leadership. MoFo has strongly denied the claim.

David Sandford, chairman of US firm Sanford Heisler Sharp, which is acting for the women, said: “MoFo promotes itself as a progressive firm that champions the advancement of women, but that seems to be far from the truth.

“When its female attorneys become pregnant, give birth, and take maternity leave, they are routinely denied opportunities for promotion and higher pay. When they return to work, MoFo routinely holds them back. At MoFo, motherhood is a career-breaker.”

His colleague, Deborah Marcuse, added: “MoFo’s employment practices perpetuate the ‘good old boys’ club’ culture that has dominated law firms for decades.

“MoFo’s standard operating procedure of delaying the advancement of women who have taken pregnancy leave holds women back and promotes damaging stereotypes of women in the legal profession.”

All three claimants took maternity leave but claim that, on their return to work, MoFo held them back from promotion but still raised their hourly billing rates as if they had been promoted.

One of the unnamed women said a supervising partner told her she would have to “work really hard to prove [she was] committed and to get the best, most interesting work”, because he presumed she was no longer committed to her job given her new status as a mother.

US lawyers working in MoFo’s overseas offices, including London, will be able to join the action, but there is no action planned for the English courts.

Sanford Heisler Sharp represents several female lawyers bringing actions against major US law firms. The firm has filed cases against Greenberg Traurig, Chadbourne & Parke (now Norton Rose Fulbright) and Sedgwick – which all recently settled – and is continuing action against Ogletree Deakins and Proskauer Rose.

A MoFo spokeswoman said: “Morrison & Foerster has a long and proven track record of supporting and advancing our associates as they return from maternity leave. We vigorously dispute this claim and are confident that the firm will be vindicated.”




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

Our latest special report, produced in association with Temple Legal Protection, looks at the role of after-the-event (ATE) insurance in commercial litigation post-LASPO. We are at a time when insurers, solicitors, clients and litigation funders work ever more closely to create funding packages that work for all of them, with conditional fee and even damages-based agreements now part of many law firms’ armoury.

Blog

11 November 2019

Taking a strategic approach to cyber-risk

If you forced 10 cyber-criminals to sit through an average law firm’s IT committee meeting, they’d be turning themselves in to the National Crime Agency before it reached AOB.

Read More

Loading animation