Lawyers will be able to replace work lost to online court, says government


MoJ: future-proofing justice system

Lawyers should be able to replace any work lost to the online court (OC) with other cases, the government said yesterday, although it did not suggest how this would be done.

The blithe statement came in an impact assessment published alongside the Prisons and Courts Bill, which will establish a new online procedure capable of applying to civil, family and tribunal proceedings, overseen by a dedicated online procedure rules committee

Lord Justice Briggs – whose recommendation the Ministry of Justice is following – said the OC offered opportunities for lawyers to offer unbundled advice to claimants.

The impact assessment said: “We expect that the new rule-making process would be applied in a way that leads to a more intuitive online court process. This is likely to be the result of establishing a rules committee with different expertise and a specific mandate to create simple rules.

“This may reduce the need of some claimants to engage lawyers in the online court, as one of the design features of the online court is a process which requires less specialist legal knowledge, this could lead to a reduction in income for solicitors from these cases.

“However, it is assumed that solicitors and other approved professionals would be able to substitute the time they currently spend on dealing with these cases with other work with the same income resulting in no net loss of income.”

The assessment predicted that the proposed procedure would help parties to civil litigation “narrow down the issues and resolve their cases through online dispute resolution (ODR), or via a mediated settlement, so reserving judicial time for only the most complex cases”.

It said the OC would do this by:

  • Encouraging parties to communicate to each other the relevant details of and evidence about their case at the earliest possible stage;
  • Opening up opportunities for conciliation, whether as the result of the digitisation of the exchange of documents, or through the expansion of pre-trial mediation; and
  • Enabling the case, if still not resolved, to be managed and made ready for hearing with all the requisite information available on an electronic file, “thereby making more efficient the processes of a case officer and judicial preparation and determination”.

The assessment said the £1bn being spent on court and tribunal modernisation aimed to future-proof the justice system: “The reforms will fundamentally change systems and processes and be built around the use of modern technologies to ensure the court and tribunal system is able to respond as promptly, effectively and proportionately to the needs of its different users that will be equally effective in 2050 as 2020.

“It would be a court and tribunal system that proactively helps people to navigate their way to the best resolution for them; uses the simplest language, process and systems; has the minimum number of steps possible that people need to go through to obtain justice; and improves access to justice.”




    Readers Comments

  • Richard Gray says:

    Not bad for a 9-5 civil servant on a big fat pension not available in the private sector and who has never had to actively find a morsel of work in their life, employ people, run a business and conduct a professional activity -what is happening with our professional bodies?

  • Richard Gray says:

    why is there a nutting and continued attack upon lawyers can anyone government profession or otherwise tell us please?


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Use the tools available to stop doing the work you shouldn’t be doing anyway

We are increasingly taken for granted in the world of Do It Yourself, in which we’re required to do some of the work we have ostensibly paid for, such as in banking, travel and technology


Quality indicators – peer recommendations over review websites

I often feel that I am banging the SRA’s drum for them when it comes to transparency but it’s because I genuinely believe in clarity when it comes to promoting quality professional services.


Embracing the future: Navigating AI in litigation

Whilst the UK courts have shown resistance to change over time, in the past decade they have embraced the use of some technologies that naturally improve efficiency. Now we’re in the age of AI.


Loading animation