Lawyer abandons career at Bar to set up CILEx entity


Joshi: six-year search for pupillage

A barrister who spent six years fruitlessly trying to obtain a pupillage has instead become an immigration practitioner as the head of her own firm – one of the most recent entities to be regulated by the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx).

Khyati Joshi, the sole principal of London practice Joshi Advocates, was licensed by CILEx Regulation in February, one of two entities to receive approval so far this year and one of 13 altogether authorised since 2015.

Ms Joshi was called to the Bar in October 2011. She spent six years seeking pupillage, making more than 200 applications. During her search she worked as a paralegal but was determined to practice on her own account.

In a video posted on her firm’s website, she said: “I was feeling trapped, wondering why am I not getting pupillage? …

“That did not stop me and seven years down the line I am now regulated to give immigration law advice and represent my clients in court.

“I am supported by CILEx Regulation through and through, and for the last three years they have assessed me to become a practitioner… I am truly grateful.”

Ms Joshi used the experience of being rejected as a marketing tool, telling potential clients: “Know that I [too] have gone through my share of difficult times, having been rejected continuously…

“But the thought of not being able to apply my own approach to a case that I know is for the best in the client’s interest drove me to achieve what I have today.

“If I can see better days, you can too… Be  persistent, be resilient.”

Speaking to Legal Futures, Ms Joshi said CILEx Regulation was supportive, meaning that she could call up with a regulation-related question at any time.

She gave the example of when the Home Office said it could not respond to the firm because, as far as the department knew, she was not a recognised immigration law practitioner. She raised the matter with CILEx Regulation and “within hours” she had a letter confirming that indeed she was.

The application process was rigorous, she said: “It was a three-application process – fellowship, practitioner, then the entity – so it took a lot of energy out of me.”

A CILEx inspection of the practice in August found “I was compliant in every aspect”.

Whereas the Bar course had given her advocacy skills, the CILEx application “gave me the confidence to run my own practice”, said Ms Joshi.

She said becoming a practising barrister now “would be backtracking on the career ladder”.

She was volunteering for a trial of potential applicants for a role as a judge, so when she became eligible to apply in future, she would know how to do it.

She had no plans to expand her practice beyond immigration: “I always wanted to specialise in a particular area and be a master of it, to the extent that you can be a master of immigration law, which is forever changing.”




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

No larger firm can ignore the demands of innovation – that was the clear message from our most recent roundtable: “The law firm of the future”, sponsored by LexisNexis Enterprise Solutions. It comes in many forms, predominantly but not just technology, and is not simply a case of automating process. Expertise and process are not mutually exclusive.

Blog

16 November 2018

Transparency is about a lot more than just price

The transparency agenda is much more than the figures you put on your website; it all comes back to communication, the root of so many lawyers’ problems if you look at the types of complaint that go to the Legal Ombudsman.

Read More