Law firms “failing to respond” to consumer enquiries

Calls: Gold standard follow-up time is 15 minutes

Law firms are losing business by failing to get back to potential clients, with as many as one in five enquiries going unanswered, new research shows.

However, follow-up with would-be clients once the initial conversation has taken place is improving, according to a mystery shopping exercise by marketing collective First4Lawyers.

It said few firms consistently achieved the gold standard of returning calls within 15 minutes of the enquiry and some were taking hours or days – or not contacting the would-be client at all.

Mystery shoppers from customer experience company insight6 contacted 50 personal injury (PI) and 50 wills practices by phone and through their websites for First4Lawyers’ ninth annual white paper, being launched today at our PI Futures conference.

Some 35 firms were tested for both and the research said enquires about PI elicited a far faster response than those for wills, “suggesting many do not apply consistent service standards across their different practice areas”.

For PI, 56% of callers were put through to a fee-earner or specialist on the first attempt, while 8% heard back within 15 minutes and a further 8% within two hours.

But 8% more waited more than two working days for a response and 4% didn’t receive one at all.

For wills, 40% of callers were put through at once and 16% were called back within two hours. Again, 8% waited more than two working days, but 20% did not get a callback at all.

When it came to web enquiries, 28% of shoppers received a (non-automated) response by phone (mostly) or email within 15 minutes, and a further 36% within two hours. But for 8% it took longer than two days and 16% did not hear a thing. Web enquires for wills were worse, with 24% responded to in the first two hours but 20% receiving nothing.

More positively, the research said, customers were broadly happy when they did speak to firms but the rating of their overall experience was coloured by how quickly they received a callback. Some 60% of those who called a PI firm rated their overall experience at eight out of 10 or higher, compared to 40% of wills callers.

The exercise mirrored one First4Lawyers carried out five years ago with only PI firms. The company said that, while it generated broadly the same results in terms of the customer experience when they made contact, there has been “a notable improvement” in follow-up – although “this in part reflects just how poor it was five years ago”.

For example, while in 2018 just 11% of PI firms offered to send the client further information, 59% did this year, with firms now much more likely to send follow-up emails and text messages.

The latest research also uncovered “a haphazard approach” by firms in opening themselves up to other channels where potential clients can contact them, such as using live chat and various forms of social media.

In many cases, it said, even when firms used platforms such as Facebook or Instagram, they were not connected to their websites.

First4Lawyers’ managing director Qamar Anwar said: “While law firms spend a lot of time and money getting the phone to ring or the email to ping with prospective clients, our research shows that many are still not putting enough emphasis on what happens when they do.

“One curious anomaly is the difference in service standards at firms offering both PI and wills and that is one obvious area where there’s room for improvement. When it comes to referrals, for example, a PI client will expert the same level of service from the wills department.

“While there is much to praise in what we’ve found, the reality is there is still much to do to keep pace with the change in how consumers are engaging with law firms.”

The white paper identified three areas where law firms should be focusing: engaging with review and comparison websites – “Naysaying and denying they will ever work for legal services only prolongs the inevitable,” it said – employing user experience technology, and imposing customer service frameworks that cover the whole practice.

Mr Anwar added: “The issues highlighted may seem small but, in today’s world where convenience is king, it could all add up to a very costly error for those law firms that fail to do something about it…

“The battle for clients is getting ever fiercer and no law firm can afford to ignore it. If you cannot compete on price, then you have to distinguish yourself in another way and customer experience is the obvious one.”

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


A two-point plan to halve the size of the SRA

I have joked for many years that you could halve the size (and therefore cost) of the Solicitors Regulation Authority overnight by banning both client account and sole practitioners.

Key cyber and data security questions to ask a legal IT provider

One of the growing priorities that law firms face when considering a legal technology provider is cyber and data security, such as their responsibilities and cyber incident management.

Navigating carer’s leave: A personal journey and call for change

The Carer’s Leave Act 2023, which came into force on 6 April 2024, was a pivotal moment for the UK. It allows workers to take up to five unpaid days off a year to carry out caring responsibilities.

Loading animation