Law firms face financial management duty


Good accounting: firms to be required to disclose if they are in trouble

There should be a new core duty on financial management, along with requirements that firms disclose financial problems to their regulator, in the Solicitors Code of Conduct, the SRA has been advised.

The SRA board was told last month (January) that it is in both the public and consumer interest to take a series of measures that focus on the financial stability of the law firms it regulates.

The work forms part of the SRA’s financial assurance project, which also includes revising the Solicitors Accounts Rules to take account of the move to alternative business structures (ABSs).

KPMG is advising the SRA on this and in a presentation to the board explained how financial instability has a significant impact on both the profession and the public in terms of dishonesty, financial mismanagement, reputational risk, costs of intervention and access to justice.

It identified various pressures bearing down on law firms, including ABSs, economic issues (such as reduced activity and margins, as well as redundancies and partner exits), technological change and tougher credit conditions. KPMG urged a more proactive approach to make the SRA aware earlier than now of firms’ financial positions. This would include firms providing the SRA with more information and disclosing the fact that they are in financial difficulties.

KPMG recommended a series of measures:

  • Changes to duties and disclosure
    • A new core duty on good financial management and disclosure; and
    • A requirement for ‘living wills’ – that is, succession planning.
  • Changes to firms’ responsibilities
    • Self-certification (burden needs to be proportionate but much data is already provided to professional indemnity insurers and banks);
    • Some regular training in financial management;
    • Mandatory preparation of business plans for new firms ahead of licensing; and
    • A duty of notify the Sra when a firm is in difficulties.
  • Changes to how the SRA works
    • Better identification of firms at risk – develop more sector-based economic analysis;
    • Better use of data provided already;
    • Addition of questions used by the Law Society of Scotland into the accountant’s report; and
    • More support and advice to firms.

However, Marcus Sephton, head of regulatory services at KPMG, said that after consultation with various stakeholders, it had decided against recommending capital adequacy requirements for law firms. He said it would be very difficult to devise an approach that would apply to all firms and would not be proportionate.

After further work, these proposals will go out to consultation with the profession later in the year.

Tags:




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


What challenges will the Bar face in the next five years?

As we look towards the end of 2021 and at how the Bar has adapted to the harsh realities of the pandemic, the question beckons as to what the future holds.


The rise of cyber-criminal threat for law firms since Covid-19

The global coronavirus pandemic, and the rise in people working from home, has unfortunately provoked a growth in cyber-crime. The UK government estimates that the cost of cyber-crime is £27bn per annum.


How to ensure your ATE cover is adequate security for costs

When does an after-the-event insurance policy provide adequate security for a defendant’s costs? The short answer is that it very much depends on the wording of the particular policy.


Loading animation