Law firms face £6m negligence claim from property investors


Investments: Hotels and student digs were not built

Two law firms have been facing multiple claims worth nearly £6m from disgruntled investors who lost money on hotels and student accommodation that were never built.

Northampton-based Scott Fowler and Yorkshire firm Wilsons were facing four separate claims involving multiple claimants, totalling 166 against Scott Fowler and 56 against Wilsons.

The information about the case came out in a ruling on costs budgets from Chief Master Marsh in the Chancery Division, handed down last week following a hearing in May. He said some of the cases have settled in the time since the hearing, but did not specify how many.

The claimants, many of who are resident abroad, agreed to purchase as an investment a long-leasehold interest in units of hotel and/or student accommodation which were to have been built at seven locations across England.

They had to pay substantial deposits ranging from 30% to 50% upon exchange of contracts. The developments were not built and the developers became insolvent.

The deposits should have been protected against default by the developer by deposit protection bonds taken out with Northern & Western Insurance Company Ltd (NWIC). However, NWIC did not pay out under any of the bonds and entered insolvent liquidation.

It is alleged that Wilsons and Scott Fowler, which acted for the claimants, were in breach of their duties and liable for the claimants’ losses. The claims have an aggregate value of about £5.7m.

The four claims are not subject to a group litigation order but are being case managed in a similar manner, with 22 lead cases being tried.

Master Marsh said there was another group of claimants out there, but their application to be case managed with these four was rejected. He did not name the defendant/s.

He added that one additional claim was brought against Hull firm Graham & Rosen, “but that claim is no longer pursued following settlement terms having been agreed”.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Change in regulator shouldn’t make AML less of a priority

While SRA fines for AML have been climbing, many in the profession aren’t confident they will get any relief from the FCA, a body used to dealing with a highly regulated industry.


There are 17 million wills waiting to be written

The main reason cited by people who do not have a will was a lack of awareness as to how to arrange one. As a professional community, we seem to be failing to get our message across.


The case for a single legal services regulator: why the current system is failing

From catastrophic firm collapses to endemic compliance failures, the evidence is mounting that the current multi-regulator model is fundamentally broken.


Loading animation