Law firm rebuked after overcharging for deputyship work


SRA: Proportionate outcome

A Dorset law firm has been rebuked after taking more money in costs than it was entitled to from a man subject to a deputyship order.

Frettens accepted the sanction as part of a regulatory settlement agreement with the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA). It will also pay costs of £1,350.

Frettons, based in Christchurch, is a broad practice with seven partners and around 50 fee-earners in all.

The deputyship order entitled the firm to fixed costs of £1,500 in the first year and £1,185 in subsequent years, plus VAT.

It said that if the deputy preferred the costs to be assessed, the Senior Courts Costs Office would carry out a detailed assessment on the standard basis.

In the three years before the man’s death in 2015, according to the agreement, Frettons took payment of costs from his estate in excess of the fixed costs permitted, without having them assessed.

It then had the costs assessed and eventually refunded the estate with just under £3,000 in relation to costs billed over and above the amounts set out in the final costs certificates.

Frettons admitted that it failed to behave in a way that maintains the trust the public places in the firm and in the provision of legal services, and failed to protect client money and assets.

The SRA said it considered the agreed outcome to be appropriate because the conduct was “deliberate or reckless and affected a vulnerable person”, and the agreed outcome was a proportionate outcome in the public interest.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

Our latest special report, produced in association with Temple Legal Protection, looks at the role of after-the-event (ATE) insurance in commercial litigation post-LASPO. We are at a time when insurers, solicitors, clients and litigation funders work ever more closely to create funding packages that work for all of them, with conditional fee and even damages-based agreements now part of many law firms’ armoury.

Blog

6 December 2019

Still running Windows 7? Cyber-criminals are on your trail

When the end-of-life date arrives, it is estimated thone in four PCs will still be running Windows 7. This figure will be higher in industries slower to embrace IT developments – legal is likely to be amongst those.

Read More

Loading animation