Law firm fined after building up £105k in residual client balances


Curwens: All breaches rectified

A North London law firm that allowed £105,000 of residual client balances to build up over 13 years has been fined £14,000 by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).

Curwens in Enfield was sanctioned for other accounts rules breaches spanning several years as well after it self-reported in 2021.

Among the inadequate procedures to deal with residual client balances on inactive or closed matters between 2008 and 2021 was the failure to send annual letters to clients on the amount of money held on their behalf. “Had the firm done so, this may have raised a red flag,” the SRA said.

The regulator also found that, for eight years, the firm’s systems and processes did not identify and allocate unidentified receipts in client account, “leading to an improper use of a suspense ledger with a significant unresolved balance of £34,453”.

Further, it used its client account as a banking facility for a decade by receiving, holding and transferring £103,000 in relation to rent and rent deposits received in relation to the firm’s offices – which were owned by partners, ex-partners and connected parties – where there was no underlying transaction or regulated service being provided.

In a regulatory settlement agreement published yesterday, the SRA said in took into account the fact that Curwens self-reported, “expressed remorse that the firm’s compliance systems and processes were not sufficiently robust”, and fully rectified the problems.

The firm put in place a financial compliance action plan and taskforce to improve compliance and provided the SRA with regular updates, while also training staff to improve awareness of the accounts rules.

The regulator said a fine was the appropriate outcome: “The conduct showed a disregard for the firm’s regulatory obligations and whilst the breaches have been rectified the misconduct continued for longer than was reasonable.

“There was no lasting significant harm to clients or third parties but there was the potential there would have been if the misconduct had continued.”

The firm’s records were good, which enabled Curwens to identify and return funds to its clients, with interest.

The SRA’s penalty guidance indicated a fine of £16,607.60, based on the firm’s turnover, which it reduced to £14,116.46 to reflect the mitigation.

Curwens also agreed to pay costs of £600.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


GEO – the impact of AI on digital marketing for law firms

GEO represents the biggest change in online business generation that I can remember. You cannot afford to stick with the same old engine optimisation techniques.


What the law can learn from fintech’s onboarding revolution

Client onboarding has always been slow. It’s not just about the paperwork and manual workflows; it’s also about those long AML checks and verifications.


Civil enforcement – progress at last with CJC report

‘When do I get my money?’ is a question that litigators acting for successful parties are used to fielding. The value of judgments is of course in the recovery made.


Loading animation