Law firm fined £64k for AML breaches lasting six years


Money laundering: Firm not in compliance for six years

A Kent law firm has been fined nearly £64,000 for basic anti-money laundering (AML) control breaches over many years, one of the larger penalties handed out for the failures.

For six years to May 2024, TG Baynes in Bexleyheath failed to establish and maintain policies, controls and procedures to mitigate and manage effectively the risks of money laundering and terrorist financing, as identified in any firm-wide risk assessment, as required by the 2017 Money Laundering Regulations.

It also failed to conduct client and matter risk assessments (CMRAs).

A notice published by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) on Friday said the firm “was provided with guidance and took steps to rectify the issues” and came into compliance by June 2024.

A fine reflected the failure “to have proper regard to the SRA’s guidance and warning notices”, and any lesser sanction “would not provide a credible deterrent to the firm, and others”.

The fine was set at 1.6% of the firm’s annual domestic turnover, reduced by 30% in light of the mitigation, including the firm’s co-operation with the regulator. There was no evidence that harm had materialised as a result of the misconduct.

The meant a final figure of £63,869, plus costs of £1,350. As TG Baynes is an alternative business structure, the SRA was able to fine it more than the £25,000 limit for traditional firms, although we reported recently that it is working to activate its new power to levy unlimited fines on all types of firm in cases of economic crime.

This is the latest in a steady stream of fines for similar breaches; earlier this month, London firm Gordons Partnership was fined £77,784.

Since we reported on that, there have been seven other firms, excluding TG Baynes, fined for similar AML breaches, totalling £88,000. They included Greater Manchester firm Bannister Preston, fined £22,831 for failing to conduct CMRAs on six conveyancing files.

All fines are paid to HM Treasury.




Blog


The AI question law firms should answer before a client asks it

Most law firms we speak to are already using AI, whether or not they have approved it, because fee-earners are doing it anyway. The tool people settle on is often Claude.


From chat to Cowork: preparing your law firm for agentic AI

AI is evolving quickly. For law firms still working out how to get consistent value from the tools they already have, the conversation has moved on again to agentic AI.


Why good governance matters when managing Law Society forms

Everyday legal transactions rely on Law Society forms. But they are often treated as static templates rather than what they really are: living documents that change over time.


Loading animation