Law firm fined £11,000 for overcharging DBA clients


Cap: Solicitors can only take 25% of PI client’s damages

A law firm that charged personal injury clients more than it was allowed to when acting under damages-based agreements (DBAs) has been fined nearly £11,000 by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).

The 2013 DBA regulations only allow lawyers to deduct up to 25% of a client’s damages in personal injury cases for their fees, but Bradford firm Proctor & Hobbs was charging 35%.

According to a notice published yesterday by the SRA, an investigation found the firm had deducted this figure in all of the 13 road traffic accident files it sampled.

It later transpired that there were at least 26 client files where this occurred.

The firm then obtained independent advice, which confirmed that it was not entitled to deduct 35%. It refunded affected clients any deductions over 25% and paid them compensation of £100 each.

The SRA said Proctor & Hobbs failed to uphold public trust or act in the best interests of its clients, and breached the rules on complying with legislative requirements and keeping up-to-date with them.

A fine was appropriate because the misconduct was “serious” and “clients will have been placed in a disadvantageous negotiating position in agreeing to the firm’s 35% deduction from damages”.

Applying the SRA’s fining guidance led to a penalty of 2.8% of the firm’s annual turnover and then reduced “to give credit for the firm’s swift and decisive action once the issue had been identified”.

This led to a figure of £10,730 plus costs of £1,350.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


How legal judgement is shifting in in-house practice

Across UK organisations, legal teams are now involved earlier in decision-making, often before proposals have taken a settled shape.


AI in family law – drawing the line for clients and lawyers

AI is becoming increasingly intertwined with family law. Clients are using it to draft initial enquiries, prepare statements and, in some cases, to support themselves as litigants in person.


Why AI and leadership choices will define law firm profitability in 2026

Despite rapid advances in legal technology, the future of law will not be determined by software alone. It will be shaped by leadership decisions.


Loading animation