Law firm COFA barred for transferring funds from client account


Intervention: Firm closed in March

The COFA of an eight-office Home Counties law firm shut down by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) earlier this year has been barred from the profession.

Jeffrey Hazelgrove, who was head of finance and operations and the compliance officer for finance and administration at Hunter’s Solicitors, acted dishonestly in transferring client money, it said.

As he is not a solicitor, the SRA has issued Mr Hazelgrove, whose last known address was in Buckinghamshire, with a control order under section 43 of the Solicitors Act 1974, which means he cannot work at a regulated law firm in future without its permission.

It said he worked at Hunter’s from March 2021 until 12 February 2026. “Between May 2025 and 12 February 2026, Mr Hazelgrove authorised and made transfers from the firm’s client account to its office account, to ensure its liabilities could be met and in circumstances where those transfers could not be justified.

“Mr Hazelgrove’s actions were found to be dishonest.”

Headquartered in High Wycombe, Hunter’s had about 44 staff offering litigation, insolvency, family, residential and commercial conveyancing, and private client services.

It is not to be confused with well-known Lincoln’s Inn law firm Hunters.

When it intervened in the firm in March, the SRA said it acted because there was “reason to suspect dishonesty” on the part of Mr Hazelgrove.

Further, the SRA intervened in the individual practices of Angelo Luiz-Barrea, Christopher Stocker and Howard Rind, as managers of the firm for failing to comply with SRA rules.

The firm operated as Hunter’s in High Wycombe and Westcliff-On-Sea, near Southend, and also as Franklins Solicitors (Abingdon, Oxfordshire), Batemans (Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire), Kealy Farmar (Henley-on-Thames), Grower Freeman (central London), Colemans (Maidenhead, Berkshire) and Graham White & Co (Bushey, Hertfordshire).

 Mr Hazelgrove was ordered to pay “a proportion” of the SRA’s costs of £600.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Beyond PCP: Can regulators and lawyers work better together next time?

Nearly a decade after the Financial Conduct Authority began investigating the car finance industry, the story of the PCP commission scandal is still unfinished.


Accountability has to live within governance, not with one person

The assumption has long been that a COLP or COFA is personally exposed to the consequences of anti-money laundering breaches.


The SRA’s client money reforms: good intentions, questionable execution

On the face of it, the SRA’s plans to tighten protections around client money sounds sensible. The detail, as ever, tells a more complicated story.


Loading animation