Land Registry system will reject applications with “simple” errors


Land Registry: 24 checks to be made

HM Land Registry (HMLR) is to up efforts to reduce the number of requisitions it has to send to conveyancers by automatically checking for “simple errors” in applications to amend the register.

It will then not accept the applications without them being corrected.

Figures last autumn showed that 22% of the more than 4.4 million applications received in the previous year (947,000) required a requisition, each containing an average of two points, but many with more.

Requisitions are sent when something is missing from or wrong with an application to amend the register.

As well as adding on average 15 working days to the time it took for a transaction to be registered, HMLR estimated that requisitions could be costing lawyers as much as £19m, with £3.6m attributable just to getting names wrong.

From 1 October, all users of the digital registration service, on both the HMLR portal and through third-party software providers, will be unable to submit applications that contain any of 24 different errors and omissions, from names to disclosable overriding interests to title scope.

The need for evidence of consent to restriction and evidence of discharge will be checked and flagged to the applicant, but they will be able to submit without supplying evidence. If it is not provided, a requisition will be sent.

HMLR said it would be working with third-party software providers to support adoption of the new service.

It estimated that, by 2028, the service could save customers an estimated 300,000 hours a year. It would also reduce administrative work and improve HMLR’s overall service speeds.

Mark Gray, chief transformation and technology officer, said: “This is another key milestone in improving our customer service and our processing times. By preventing errors up-front, automating routine tasks and removing unnecessary correspondence, we will save time for our customers and our caseworkers alike.

“This is just the next step in modernising and automating more of our work, there is much more to come.”

The organisation said it would introduce further checks on the data contained in transfer and charge deeds in late 2026.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Change in regulator shouldn’t make AML less of a priority

While SRA fines for AML have been climbing, many in the profession aren’t confident they will get any relief from the FCA, a body used to dealing with a highly regulated industry.


There are 17 million wills waiting to be written

The main reason cited by people who do not have a will was a lack of awareness as to how to arrange one. As a professional community, we seem to be failing to get our message across.


The case for a single legal services regulator: why the current system is failing

From catastrophic firm collapses to endemic compliance failures, the evidence is mounting that the current multi-regulator model is fundamentally broken.


Loading animation