KPMG adds £5m payout to £3m fine over conduct of Quindell audit


KPMG: No admission of liability

Big Four accountant KPMG has paid £5m to settle a claim brought by what used to be called Quindell over its audit of the one-time alternative business structure.

Watchstone Group, as Quindell is now known, announced yesterday that the settlement was made without admission of liability.

It sued KPMG over the conduct of its 2013 audit. Trial was not expected before 2024. KPMG had no comment except to confirm the agreement.

In 2018, the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) reprimanded and fined KPMG £3.15m after admitting misconduct in the audit, with audit engagement partner William Smith fined a further £84,000.

The fines were reduced from £4.5m and £120,000 respectively due to a settlement deal. KPMG was ordered to pay a further £146,000 in costs.

The FRC began its investigation in August 2015 after Quindell’s 2014 accounts were published with substantial restatements of prior year revenues, profits and net assets.

It said both KPMG and Mr Smith admitted that their conduct fell “significantly short” of the standards reasonably expected by their regulator, the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.

The failures included not obtaining either reasonable assurance that the financial statements as a whole were free from material misstatement or sufficient appropriate audit evidence, and not exercising “sufficient professional scepticism”.

Watchstone has sold all of the group’s businesses in recent years and now focuses exclusively on managing its litigation assets.

Last year, it listed on the Aquis Stock Exchange to continue to provide a trading facility on a regulated market and delisted from AIM.

The main piece of outstanding litigation is against another Big Four accountant, PwC, which is expected to go to trial in January 2023.

This £63m claim alleges that PwC used confidential information to reduce the amount Slater & Gordon paid to buy Quindell’s professional services division.

There are two other pieces of litigation. One is a bid to recover £2m in historic VAT paid by Ingenie, Quindell’s telematics business.

Earlier this year, the First-tier Tax Tribunal found in favour of HM Revenue & Customs over the VAT treatment of certain supplies made by Ingenie. Watchstone is appealing to the Upper Tribunal.

The other is a claim by the group’s Canadian subsidiary against Aviva Canada, which is expected to go to trial in January 2024.

Last year, the Serious Fraud Office ended its investigation into what happened before the sale to Slater & Gordon with no further action.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


The path to partnership: Bridging the gender gap in law firms

The inaugural LSLA roundtable discussed the significant gender gap at partner level in law firms and what more can be done to increase the rate of progress.


Why private client solicitors should work with financial planners – and tell their clients

Ever since the SRA introduced the transparency rules in 2018, we have encouraged solicitors to not just embrace the regulations and the thinking behind them, but to go far beyond.


A paean to pupils and pupillage

To outsiders, it may seem that it’s our horsehair wigs and Victorian starched collars that are the most unusual thing about the barristers’ profession. I would actually suggest it’s our training.


Loading animation