Just Costs staff win claim for unpaid wages


Manchester employment tribunal: Successful claims

Twenty four members of staff at Just Costs Solicitors, which went into administration in January, have won an employment tribunal claim for unpaid wages.

Employment Judge Franey in Manchester said the firm failed to comply with the requirements of section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 to consult appropriate representatives of the employees about the dismissal.

As a result, the firm was ordered to pay to each claimant remuneration for the protected period of 90 days from 25 January 2019 when the first of the dismissals took effect.

Just Costs was set up in 2006 and was the first law firm to specialise purely in legal costs. It became an alternative business structure in 2013, at which point it had nearly 100 staff and a turnover of more than £5m.

In November 2016, it began operating under a company voluntary arrangement, under which it sought to repay creditors in full with 24 monthly payments of £33,000.

A year later, after it failed to keep up with the schedule – 28% of what was owed was paid – the firm was sold out of administration to a new practice set up by founder Paul Shenton and fellow solicitors Jodi Booth and Adam Quinn that traded as Just Costs Solicitors (JCS).

The joint administrators appointed in January blamed both “the regulatory and financial pressures currently being placed on the sector” and cash flow issues for its failure.

For the 11 months to 30 September 2018, turnover was £2.2m, with a loss of £380,000.

Their first progress report said that, by 31 July, £33,200 had been collected from the firms that bought Just Costs’ work in progress.

Of the 952 files that were transferred to six different firms, clients requested that 125 of them be transferred to another practice. Some 196 files were rejected by the panel put together by Recovery First.

The predecessor firms were secured creditors, still owed £740,000, but debtor collections have cleared the debt owed to Close, which funded Just Costs through an invoice finance facility.

The update said that, at that time, it was unlikely that a liquidator would be appointed for the purpose of enabling a distribution to unsecured creditors.

The administrators also said it identified no need for further investigations into what happened at the firm.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

Our latest special report, produced in association with Temple Legal Protection, looks at the role of after-the-event (ATE) insurance in commercial litigation post-LASPO. We are at a time when insurers, solicitors, clients and litigation funders work ever more closely to create funding packages that work for all of them, with conditional fee and even damages-based agreements now part of many law firms’ armoury.

Blog

16 January 2020

Making Tax Digital throws spotlight on outdated legal IT systems

The first year of Making Tax Digital for VAT, known as the soft landing period, ends this April. During these first 12 months, firms without a compliant legal accounts package have used bridging software.

Read More

Loading animation