Junior solicitor lied about applying for grants of probate


Probate: Eight matters affected

A junior solicitor who told clients, colleagues and others that she had submitted applications for grants of probate when she had not, has been struck off.

The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) also found that Rachel Parker, 36, had lied when she told people that she had chased the Probate Registry for the grants, often blaming delays there for the wait.

It said “the dishonest conduct was deliberate, calculated and repeated over a period of over a year. Ms Parker created a substantial risk of serious harm to her clients”.

She qualified in 2019 and worked in the estate administration team at the law firm Buckles. Her actions took place between September 2022 and November 2023.

Ms Parker resigned and left the firm in March 2024, and a subsequent investigation into her handling of eight probate matters revealed her failures to act.

In a statement of agreed facts and outcome, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) said she admitted to what she had done.

In mitigation, which was not agreed by the SRA, Ms Parker said that at the time she was “experiencing significant mental health challenges, including symptoms consistent with anxiety and depression and which were exacerbated by excessive workloads, personal stressors, and a lack of adequate support at work”.

These difficulties “directly contributed to her inability to manage deadlines, communications, and follow through on tasks”.

Ms Parker said she did not act for personal gain, had co-operated with the regulator and offered her “sincere, and genuine, apology”.

However, she did not contend that this amounted to exceptional circumstances which would justify the SDT making any order other than she should be struck off – the usual sanction in cases of dishonesty.

The SDT agreed, describing it as “the only appropriate and proportionate sanction”.

Ms Parker also agreed to pay costs of £5,000.




Blog


Is your Google Ads budget funding your competitors’ AI visibility?

If your cost-per-click has crept up again this year, you’ve probably assumed the market simply got more expensive. That’s the wrong way to read what’s happening.


Containing the spread of unapproved AI

Nearly 60% of fee-earners admit to using unapproved tools (like free versions of ChatGPT). Yet 68% of firm leaders are confident there is zero risk of unapproved AI being used for client work.


When AI adoption goes wrong, costs add up fast

City AM recently reported that London is fighting to claim the title of ‘global capital of legal AI’. However, it’s crucial we remember that adoption alone does not create value.


Loading animation