Judge overturns SDT decision to clear Axiom fund solicitors

Print This Post

11 January 2017


Agreement: contract signed when solicitors knew they could not comply with it

The High Court has overturned a decision by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal that cleared two solicitors accused of misusing £573,000 lent to their law firm by the controversial Axiom Legal Financing Fund.

David Fenton Wingate and Steven Edward Evans, who are the partners of Manchester personal injury firm WE Solicitors, and were cleared in part because they relied on assurances given to them by Richard Barnett, who was subsequently struck off himself for misusing Axiom money.

As in all of the disciplinary cases involving the Axiom fund, the case turned on the funding agreement between Axiom and the firm, the aim of which, on its face, was solely to fund PI cases but which was varied orally to allow other uses.

According to a Lawtel report of the ruling – a transcript of which has not yet been published – Mr Justice Holman found that there had been errors in the tribunal’s reasoning.

The report said: “The result and effect of the errors was that it had not asked itself whether it was professional misconduct for a solicitor to sign a contract when he knew that it was not what was agreed and he could not comply with repayment.

“The written contract was a sham and a contract for borrowing such a large sum of money should not be signed by a solicitor lightly. The public confidence would be undermined if it knew that a solicitor had signed a sham contract. The court found that [Mr Wingate] lacked integrity in breach of principle 2.”

Both solicitors had also “demonstrated manifest incompetence”; as a minimum, Mr Evans should have read the funding agreement signed on the firm’s behalf and was under a duty to take basic steps to check the correctness of the loan. Further, the pair had not run the firm properly, in breach of principle 8.

A spokesman for the Solicitors Regulation Authority said: “We welcome the decision by the High Court, but cannot say anything further until the hearing is concluded in February when sanctions will be delivered.”



2 Responses to “Judge overturns SDT decision to clear Axiom fund solicitors”

  1. It is incomprehensible to thousands of Investors in Axiom, Investors who have lost their life savings in an illegal scam that nobody has been charged either by the SFO or the SRA and leads to the belief that both bodies are either seriously compromised or simply incompetent .These Panel Solicitors who are the low hanging fruit and simply pawns in multi million pound fraud of some 200 million pounds all of which has been either stolen or lost.
    It’s a disgrace and should be referred to the Minister of Justice.

  2. J.McManus on January 14th, 2017 at 4:10 am
  3. Quite agree, it is a disgrace and nobody seems to care about the investors. Not everyone has money to throw away. Where is the justice?

  4. Cathy Glendinning on March 16th, 2017 at 1:16 am

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

New right to paid leave for bereaved parents: A welcome move

Kimberley Manning DAS

This year, like many in recent years, has seen some key changes within the employment law field, with the government, trade unions and lobbyists remaining endlessly engaged in seeking to impose their interpretation of fair balance between employers and their respective workforces. Although consensus on that equilibrium can never really be achieved, sometimes there are pieces of legislative movement which are difficult to argue with regardless of your perspective: This is one of those. Published on 13 October 2017, the Parental Bereavement (Pay and Leave) Bill would provide for the first time a legal right to parents who are employed and have suffered the death of a child, a minimum of two weeks’ leave in which to grieve.

November 20th, 2017