Jail for ‘professional’ McKenzie Friend who defrauded clients of thousands of pounds

Spurr: excellent result

Spurr: excellent result

A ‘professional’ McKenzie Friend who targeted people unable to claim legal aid and then defrauded them of thousands of pounds has been jailed for three years.

Martin Williamson, 36 of Biggleswade, pleaded guilty to 22 separate charges at Luton Crown Court last week following a successful investigation by Central Bedfordshire Council with assistance from Scam Busters.

He advertised his services as a professional McKenzie Friend on the internet, offering cheap legal services to people involved in cases involving their children or grandchildren.

The victims would pay him a fee up front, and he would then claim to have worked on their case by applying for court orders, arranging court dates, contacting former partners and their solicitors, and liaising with social services and the Child Support Agency, when he had not.

The McKenzie Friend offences took place between December 2012 and April 2014. Having been arrested and interviewed in August 2013 about the initial allegations, Mr Williamson continued offending after being released on bail.

Among his actions were producing a fake court order which he told the victim would prevent a relative taking the child out of school, faking a Criminal Records Bureau check after a victim paid for a relative’s background to be investigated, creating a fake child psychologist in order to extort payments from another victim, and falsifying court dates meaning that when the victims arrived at court they found the hearings did not exist.

He was estimated to have received around £5,000 from his clients. The council also conducted a benefit investigation and established that Mr Williamson had not declared three different jobs and therefore received £3,517 of benefits to which he was not entitled.

After pleading guilty to 15 Trading Standards offences relating to family law, one count involving fraudulent sale of a laptop and six counts of benefit fraud, Mr Williamson was jailed for a total of three years for the family law counts, with no separate penalty for the laptop count, and one month behind bars for each of the benefit fraud offences, to run concurrently with the main prison term.

HHJ Stuart Bridge told him: “Your actions were callous and premeditated. You attracted people who were unable to obtain legal support due to cuts in legal aid. You deliberately sought these people out. Once you had been paid, you broke their trust.

“You abused a position of trust. The offences were sophisticated and carefully planned. You prepared and falsified documents.

“The loss of over £5,000 was relatively low, but the high victim impact elevates this to a higher sentencing bracket. There is no doubt in my mind that the McKenzie Friend offences are so serious that an immediate custodial sentence must be imposed.”

Councillor Brian Spurr, executive member for community services at Central Bedfordshire Council, said: “Williamson’s actions had a devastating impact on their victims at an already highly stressful and emotional time, and ran the risk of jeopardising their legal cases. The lengthy prison sentence is an excellent result at the end of what has been a long investigation.”

    Readers Comments

  • Ray Barry says:

    No profession is immune from fraudsters among its ranks and this chap seems to have got his just deserts and a substantial sentence pour encourager les autres.

    The lesson here is if you’re going to use a McKenzie Friend then engage a member of the Society of Professional McKenzie Friends, of which I have the honour to be chair.

    All of our members have a minimum qualification of A-level law or 3 years full-time experience and most have significantly more than that. Many have previously worked as solicitors and some have done so for 20+ years.

    Most importantly of all, in the light of this case, all of our members have professional indemnity insurance, giving customers the reassurance of knowing they can seek financial compensation in the event of incompetence or dishonesty in the conduct of their case.

  • Phillip Coutier says:

    This chap was ‘not’ a McKenzie Friend tho!
    He was a Fraudster who used the title McKenzie Friend to fraudently take money off victims and then he never did anything.

    He did ‘not’ go to Court with people as a McKenzie Friend does.

    He could have fraudently called himself a Solicitor or Barrister and he would ‘not’ be a Solicitor or a Barrister, would he?

    Lets try and get this right.

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


EHCPs and the uphill struggle for justice

The staggering truth behind the education system supporting children with special education needs and disabilities is that it 80% of SEND children don’t receive the regular in-school support they need.

How to practise in Australia without re-qualifying

Those of you looking for a lateral career shift will be encouraged by the UK government’s announcement in June that UK lawyers will be allowed to practise in Australia without having to requalify

How to achieve a return on your legal software investment

An unlikely source of inspiration for improving efficiencies and overall performance for your firm can be found in the British Cycling team. Its success was routed in continuous optimisation.

Loading animation