Jail for conman who cloned CMC and sold fake PI claims to law firm

Sediqi showed off the money he had fraudulently accrued

A man has been jailed for orchestrating fraudulent motor insurance claims and cloning a claims management company (CMC) to pass them to a firm of solicitors in return for referral fees.

Boxer Hamid Sediqi, 36, also known under the aliases Kevin Heartbreak, Richard Joseph Johnson and Najib Sharifi, was sentenced to four years imprisonment after an investigation led by the City of London Police’s insurance fraud enforcement department (IFED).

His partner at the time, Belma Draganovic, 32, was sentenced to 11 months imprisonment, suspended for 18 months, while a further co-conspirator, Mason Smith, 24, a former boxer and reality TV show participant, received a three-month tagged curfew order.

Sediqi has previously served time for fraudulent claims. This time, having cloned the CMC, Sediqi struck a deal to refer claims to a personal injury law firm at £500 for motor claims and £700 for all other claims.

He referred 76 fraudulent claims in all, for which he received £26,070 in referral fees and is thought to have received a further £26,402 through the compensation paid out for the fraudulent claims he referred.

Sediqi was referred to IFED for investigation in 2016 after the real CMC contacted the law firm looking to work collaboratively.

“The director was shocked to learn that the solicitors allegedly had a working relationship established already with his company,” the IFED recounted.

By September 2018, Aviva had detected 62 fraudulent claims linked to Sediqi with payouts totalling nearly £200,000.

The trio operated by fraudulently opening bank accounts, using stolen IDs or completely fictitious details, to take out insurance policies with Aviva.

One of the three would then pose as the policyholder over the phone, claiming they had hit another vehicle. The third party would also be another member of the trio. To substantiate the claims, the group pulled photos of damaged vehicles from the internet and submitted them to the insurer.

The police said Sediqi and Draganovic used the money to fund a lavish lifestyle, buying a penthouse apartment in Gran Canaria and a number of “ostentatious” vehicles, including a bright pink Mazda RX7 that was seized by police and auctioned to compensate victims of Sediqi’s previous frauds.

Photos found on Sediqi’s phone showed his pet dog covered in wads of cash.

Detective Constable Haywood, from the IFED, said: “Sediqi was investigated by IFED in 2013 and received jail time for contriving road traffic collisions. [He] clearly had not learned his lesson, and has yet again attempted to gain financially from a number of fraudulent activities.

“With accomplices in tow, Sediqi managed to fraudulently accrue nearly £245,000, targeting solicitors and insurance companies, and stealing the identities of companies and members of the public. The trio of criminals became tangled in a web of lies, which ultimately led to their downfall and the truth being exposed.”

Carl Mather, special investigations unit manager at Aviva, said the case underlined the need for the incoming whiplash reforms “to tackle the disproportionate compensation attached to whiplash claims, which continues to attract fraudsters, and which pushes up premiums for all genuine customers”.

Proceedings will now commence under the Proceeds of Crime Act to recover the funds which were illegally obtained and Sediqi is also being considered for a serious crime prevention order, which, if granted, will make him subject to restrictions to prevent him from committing further crimes.

Breach of such an order is a criminal offence punishable by up to five years imprisonment and an unlimited fine.

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Automated justice: striking the balance in injury claims

No professional sector is immune from automation – even the law. However, the adoption of automated systems to settle routine injury claims raises a number of important ethical questions.

Conveyancers: are you afraid of outsourcing?

For many years, outsourcing has been seen as a bit of a scary prospect within the conveyancing sector. But thanks to the stamp duty holiday, conveyancers are now realising some of the many benefits.

You win some, you lose some – class actions post Google

In November, Google received two court rulings, through which it both closed and opened the door to class actions against it. So what do the decisions mean for future class actions?

Loading animation