Insurers “not interested in backing freelance solicitors”


New firm: Mark Briegal (left) and Paul Bennett

An expert in law firm regulation has said he does not know a single insurer interested in providing indemnity insurance to freelance solicitors.

Paul Bennett, partner at new law firm Bennett Briegal, called on the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) to allow freelance solicitors to reduce their risks by becoming limited companies.

The SRA’s plan to allow freelance solicitors will go live with its new Standards & Regulations in November.

Freelance solicitors will only be allowed to hold certain categories of client funds, not including money for conveyancing, and must have practised for at least three years to carry out reserved work.

Those that carry out reserved work must have “adequate and appropriate” indemnity insurance but are not subject to the minimum terms and conditions that apply to law firms.

“A lot of insurers don’t understand the existing model and are uncomfortable with the proposals. I don’t know of anyone prepared to support it,” Mr Bennett said.

Around 25 solicitors have contacted him asking about becoming a freelance solicitor, but the lack of limited company status would have a “very significant impact” on take-up.

“The freelance model has so much potential in enabling new ways of practice, but the SRA should allow limited companies so risks can be managed,” Mr Bennett said.

“There are different challenges for older and younger solicitors. Older lawyers will be able to manage the risk to their personal assets as a limited company or LLP.

“They may not understand the risks they are taking [as freelance solicitors] and will have full personal liability if their insurance fails.

“Younger lawyers face more of a risk to their reputation and credibility by working as freelance solicitors. Some will succeed and others fail. If they fail, they may find it harder to join a bigger legal business in the future.

“Lots of people, particularly older lawyers with their own following, are working as consultants for umbrella firms like Gunnercooke.

“Stripping that protection away to lower fees and improve access to justice could be a dangerous gamble for consumers and lawyers.”

The concerns were echoed by the Law Society in a submission to the Legal Services Board, which is considering an SRA application to update its indemnity insurance rules to take into account November’s changes.

“We have discussed the likely availability of ‘adequate and appropriate’ PII with several leading brokers… The consensus view was that any insurance that will be offered will be on terms substantially less beneficial and protective than the SRA’s [minimum terms].

“Most said that they would not be interested in providing such cover, because of the relatively small profit to be made, and the risk that it could pose to their own errors and omissions insurance, should anything go wrong.”

The society said there was a risk that some freelancers may attempt to obtain insurance through other means, seeking to cover their potential liabilities through “inappropriate personal liability insurance products”.

The SRA may need to take steps to cultivate a market in PII for freelance solicitors, it argued.

The society said it also had concerns about how freelance solicitors would determine what was an
“adequate and appropriate” level of insurance, and questioned whether the obligation on freelance solicitors to inform clients that they have made adequate insurance arrangements would provide the public with sufficient detail to make a properly informed decision.

Mr Bennett launched Bennett Briegal last month with Mark Briegal. Both were previously partners at Aaron & Partners.

He said the two-partner virtual firm aimed to become a national provider of niche advice to law firms on regulation, compliance and mergers and acquisitions.

Mr Bennett said while the partners lived in Shrewsbury and Warrington, 50% of his work was in the City of London and 50% of Mr Briegal’s in Manchester.

“Around 75% of the work we do is for law firms and solicitors on their own partnerships, terms of business, fee options and their professional obligations,” he added.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

No larger firm can ignore the demands of innovation – that was the clear message from our most recent roundtable: “The law firm of the future”, sponsored by LexisNexis Enterprise Solutions. It comes in many forms, predominantly but not just technology, and is not simply a case of automating process. Expertise and process are not mutually exclusive.

Blog

18 April 2019

Protectionism: Is it really all that bad?

So we are about to launch head first in to another great legal services experiment. Away with all those restrictive practices that successive governments consider so heinous. All hail innovation and market forces.

Read More

Loading animation