Insurer sidesteps ABS with new legal venture


Milliner: mutual values

Milliner: mutual values

LV= has created its legal offering to offer an extra service to its members and customers, rather than to make any great profit, its claims director has told Legal Futures.

LV= announced its new venture yesterday, which will be run in association with Bristol-based law firm Lyons Davidson, but it is not an alternative business structure (ABS), unlike all the other such arrangements between insurers and law firms.

Instead, the services are explicitly provided by Lyons Davidson, with Liverpool Victoria Friendly Society Ltd permitting the firm to use the LV= brand in doing so.

Martin Milliner said the insurer’s members had been asking for a legal service, which he attributed to an absence of a significant brand in the market that consumers recognised and trusted.

But LV= saw legal services as an added benefit “that fits our mutual values”, rather than a revenue stream, he said.

Just being a successful insurer was hard enough, Mr Milliner said, noting that that nobody had yet cracked being both a successful insurer and a successful law firm. This model also avoided further regulation via the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

Some insurers had formed ABSs simply to protect income, he observed, while the collapse late last year of Parabis – which had ABS joint ventures in place – showed there were risks around such arrangements.

Mr Milliner added that LV= Legal Services, which will be rolling out self-service products in the coming weeks as well, was offering “very competitive” prices on what were low-margin services, such as around £120 for a basic will and £290 for a power of attorney.

To ensure quality was maintained, Lyons Davidson would be subject to independent monitoring and also monitoring by LV’s in-house legal team, he said.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Change in regulator shouldn’t make AML less of a priority

While SRA fines for AML have been climbing, many in the profession aren’t confident they will get any relief from the FCA, a body used to dealing with a highly regulated industry.


There are 17 million wills waiting to be written

The main reason cited by people who do not have a will was a lack of awareness as to how to arrange one. As a professional community, we seem to be failing to get our message across.


The case for a single legal services regulator: why the current system is failing

From catastrophic firm collapses to endemic compliance failures, the evidence is mounting that the current multi-regulator model is fundamentally broken.


Loading animation