ICAEW’s alternative business structure licences hit 100


Peter James

James: “the mix is richer than we thought”

The number of alternative business structures licensed by the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW) to provide probate services has hit 100, it has emerged.

A further 47 accountancy firms have been authorised to provide probate services. Where all the principals in a firm are authorised, they do not need to go through the more complicated application process involved in becoming an ABS.

Peter James, head of regulatory policy at the ICAEW, told Legal Futures that applications for both kinds of firm were coming in at around 20 per month, and there were 33 more in the pipeline.

Mr James said the ICAEW had expected there to be more authorised firms than ABSs. “The mix is richer than we thought,” he said. “We thought a lot of sole practices would be involved, but there are a large number of firms with two partners or more.

“Some of the more adventurous are inviting other professionals in to create MDPs, but we’re not seeing a lot of it. Accountants are largely continuing as accountants, but doing work previously reserved to lawyers.”

Mr James said many of the ABSs licensed by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) were not providing different models of service delivery, despite their “more imaginative” shareholdings.

“The ones we have licensed may not even have a lawyer involved. We are leading in achieving the mix of services sought by the Legal Services Act.”

Legal Services Board research last week revealed that small business owners were more likely to seek legal advice from accountants than from lawyers.

In a separate development, Mr James said the ICAEW would have lay majorities on its disciplinary tribunals by January next year – two lay members and an accountant.

Under the rules, if the matter involves legal services, neither accountants nor solicitors count as ‘lay’ members. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal is usually made up of two solicitors and a lay member.

“We are ahead of the legal profession in putting the process under public scrutiny,” he added.

Earlier this month the ICAEW announced that Michael Caplan QC, one of the few solicitor QCs and a partner at Kingsley Napley for over 30 years, had been recruited to head its new regulatory board.

Tags:




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

No larger firm can ignore the demands of innovation – that was the clear message from our most recent roundtable: “The law firm of the future”, sponsored by LexisNexis Enterprise Solutions. It comes in many forms, predominantly but not just technology, and is not simply a case of automating process. Expertise and process are not mutually exclusive.

Blog

12 October 2018

The pros and cons of publishing prices

Our view is that transparency will help our clients to win in competitive situations. Published pricing helps to qualify customers before you commit time and resources to consultations and a sales process.

Read More