Hundreds of firms given preview of complaints data to be published by LeO


Complaint: 900 decisions to be public

Hundreds of law firms have been sent details of the complaints information that the Legal Ombudsman (LeO) is set to publish about them, Legal Futures has learned.

LeO was meant to publish complaints data, naming individual firms, last month for the first time, but announced that it was delaying this to ensure the accuracy of the information and that it is presented in the most helpful way.

There remains no precise date of when LeO will now publish the information, with a spokesman only able to say that it is working towards doing it in the autumn. It will include around 900 decisions involving 750 firms. After that, publication will be on a quarterly basis.

The spokesman said: “What we have already done is sent each law firm a copy of any complaints information relating to them that we’re intending to publish. This is so they can check that the information is accurate and, if not, feed back to us so that we can correct it if required. We’re making sure that everything is watertight before committing to a publication date.”

This is the only occasion that firms will receive the information in advance. After the first quarter’s data is published, LeO will instead include details of information to be published in the any subsequent quarters in its closure letters following the resolution of each complaint, allowing it to check the accuracy of information on a case-by-case basis.

LeO is instituting a twin-track approach to publication. The quarterly information will be a table that summarises the number of ombudsman decisions each legal entity has been the subject of, what the outcome was (remedy or no remedy), and the area of law in each case.

Where there is a pattern of complaints, or circumstances where it is in the public interest to publish the details of a lawyer or law firm, LeO will publish this information, regardless of whether there has been an ombudsman decision.

 

Tags:




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Change in regulator shouldn’t make AML less of a priority

While SRA fines for AML have been climbing, many in the profession aren’t confident they will get any relief from the FCA, a body used to dealing with a highly regulated industry.


There are 17 million wills waiting to be written

The main reason cited by people who do not have a will was a lack of awareness as to how to arrange one. As a professional community, we seem to be failing to get our message across.


The case for a single legal services regulator: why the current system is failing

From catastrophic firm collapses to endemic compliance failures, the evidence is mounting that the current multi-regulator model is fundamentally broken.


Loading animation