Hundreds of firms fail to meet COLP/COFA nomination deadline


Townsend: compliance officers key to outcomes-focused regulation

Around 750 law firms have failed to meet the 31 July deadline for nominating their compliance officers, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has reported.

It said that more than 93% of the 11,304 registered firms have either completed, or are in the final stages of completing, the process for nominating their compliance officer for legal practice (COLP) and for finance and administration (COFA).

In a statement, the SRA said: “During August, the SRA will be engaging with those few firms that have not yet nominated a COLP or COFA, to resolve any difficulties they have had in meeting the deadline.”

Speaking to Legal Futures last month, SRA executive director Samantha Barrass said the decision on “how much of a stick will be wielded” with firms that have not met the deadline will depend on whether firms have begun but not completed the process, or have not engaged with it at all.

She emphasised that making the nomination is a regulatory requirement, while failure to have a COLP and/or COFA in place for 1 January 2013 will be a breach of the SRA’s authorisation requirements.

For those that have submitted their nominations, the SRA will now assess those who have been put forward.

Unlike the detailed approach to COLPs and COFAs of prospective alternative business structures, the SRA will not check every law firm nomination. The SRA will take a risk-based approach, going back to a subset of firms, largely on a risk basis, but also those that are highly complex and some on a random basis, “to check that sensible judgement has been exercised by the firm”.

COLPs and COFAs are responsible for ensuring firms have systems and controls in place to enable them to comply with regulation. While responsibility for this compliance rests with the firm, its managers or the sole practitioner, the compliance officers must ensure compliance, and are responsible for recording and reporting failures in compliance.

SRA chief executive Antony Townsend said: “When we introduced outcomes-focused regulation, we moved away from the focus on prescribed rules to concentrate on what outcomes we want for the consumer and for the sector as a whole. The appointment of COLPs and COFAs is key to this new regime and we’re delighted to be in the position of assessing nominations.”

 

Tags:




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


A new route to practice rights for chartered legal executives

Following approval from the Legal Services Board in May 2022, CILEx Regulation has launched an alternative route for chartered legal executives to obtain independent practice rights.


NFTs, the courts and the role of injunctions

In May, news broke that a non-fungible token was the subject of a successful injunction made by the Singapore High Court. The NFT in question is part of the very valuable Bored Ape Yacht Club series.


Matthew Pascall

Low-value commercial cases – an achievable challenge for ATE insurers

There are many good claims brought for damages that are likely to be significantly less than twice the cost of bringing the claim. These cases present a real challenge for insurers.


Loading animation