Hourly billing leaves family law clients out in the cold, research finds


Family law services: more than a quarter paid more than £30,000 for their divorce

More than half of those going through a divorce were priced out of the legal services they would have bought and felt they needed, new research has found, with nine out of ten people told by solicitors to take or leave pricing on an hourly rate.

Meanwhile, a third of those surveyed said they would have bought legal help for a fixed fee if it had been offered, and almost as many said the cost of legal advice put them off using a lawyer altogether.

The findings strongly suggest there is an appetite for innovative pricing in family law among consumers, including fixed fees and the ‘unbundling’ of services. Legal Futures reported on two examples of unbundling in family law last week here and here.

The online survey was carried out by well-known management consultant Kim Tasso, in conjunction with two websites aimed at single mothers and single fathers respectively. More than two-thirds of respondents were male and half had an average gross household income of between £25,000 and £100,000. More than three-quarters used a solicitor and 35% used a mediator.

The cost of legal advice stopped 29% from using a lawyer and 35% said it reduced the amount of legal advice they bought. Over a quarter paid more than £30,000 for their divorce and the same number between £10,000 and £30,000.

Just 7% were offered legal advice on a fixed fee. A third said being offered this would have changed whether they used a solicitor.

Satisfaction levels with the advice they received were low – although, of course, in this most emotional of areas it is possible the outcome of their case influenced this view. A quarter said they were ‘totally dissatisfied’ with the advice received and another 31% were dissatisfied. Only 6% were ‘highly satisfied’.

Just under 60% believed the cost of legal advice “prevented them from achieving the best result for them and their children”.

The findings are largely consistent with a recent report issued by the Legal Ombudsman into complaints around family law and the particular problem of fees.

Ms Tasso said: “Solicitors must do more to communicate about fees and alternative resolution methods and to provide fixed-fee services… More innovative approaches to packaging and pricing legal services and giving clients a choice and certainty are needed.”

She added: “Many professional advisers do not appear to understand the range of skills (eg, analysis, cost accounting, buyer psychology, economics, project management etc) that are required for effective pricing strategies and service development.”

Tags:




Blog


When AI becomes a line on the client’s bill

On 23 June, Legora changed how it charges. The platform announced that its most capable product was moving away from a flat per-seat licence fee to consumption-based pricing


Which legal AI will still matter in 12 months?

Four years ago, when senior partners asked me which legal AI they should buy, I would have walked them through a vendor comparison. Now I tell them the question is wrong.


Supreme Court redraws line between member and employee in LLPs

For anyone advising professional services firms on LLP structuring, and of course for those in LLPs themselves, last week’s Supreme Court ruling is an essential read.


Loading animation