High Court: Badly drafted will shows dangers of unqualified writers


Will: Drafting betrayed limited understanding

A badly drafted will which has caused “untold anguish” to relatives of the deceased shows the dangers of using unqualified will-writers, the High Court has warned.

His Honour Judge Cadwallader, sitting in the High Court in Liverpool, said that for a will to give rise to “quite so many genuine questions of interpretation” was unusual.

He went on: “This will is drafted badly. This dispute has no doubt caused at least some of the parties untold anguish, substantial expense and delay, and destroyed family relationships.

“The evidence suggests that the will was prepared by an apparently unqualified person holding himself out as a will writer, perhaps for money. This case demonstrates the perils of trying to save expense by using the services of unqualified persons to write wills.”

HHJ Cadwallader explained how Veronica Clarke’s will used clauses, parts of clauses and words familiar to lawyers used to dealing with wills, and in standard form, “but it does so in ways which betray a limited understanding of their meaning and function, and of the underlying body of law in relation to which, when used properly, they are formed”.

He added: “They may well have been cut and pasted from some other documents or precedents, perhaps rather old ones, and then amended.”

The part 8 claim was brought by Ms Clarke’s nephew, Henry Tedford, as executor of her estate to determine the “numerous difficulties” of construction.

Mr Tedford was, under some potential constructions of the will, a potential beneficiary but the judge stressed that he had acted properly in bringing the proceedings to resolve those difficulties, since they could not be resolved by agreement.

“He would be unable as executor safely to distribute the estate without the protection of a court order. That he also has a personal interest in the outcome as a potential beneficiary does not detract from that.”

HHJ Cadwallader added that there were separate proceedings brought by two of Ms Clarke’s siblings for Mr Tedford’s removal as executor.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Change in regulator shouldn’t make AML less of a priority

While SRA fines for AML have been climbing, many in the profession aren’t confident they will get any relief from the FCA, a body used to dealing with a highly regulated industry.


There are 17 million wills waiting to be written

The main reason cited by people who do not have a will was a lack of awareness as to how to arrange one. As a professional community, we seem to be failing to get our message across.


The case for a single legal services regulator: why the current system is failing

From catastrophic firm collapses to endemic compliance failures, the evidence is mounting that the current multi-regulator model is fundamentally broken.


Loading animation