Here come the accountants – ICAEW launches ABS regulator bid


Probate: accountants not planning to hire lawyers to do work

Around 100 firms of accountants are expected to become alternative business structures (ABSs), the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW) said today as it unveiled its draft application to become a regulator of legal work.

Starting a public consultation on its plans to regulate reserved probate activities, the ICAEW laid out a twin-track approach to allow accountancy firms to do the work. They could become authorised firms – in which all principals and owners are individually authorised to conduct probate – or licensed bodies (the formal name for ABSs), in which not all principals and owners are authorised for probate.

Research conducted for the application indicated that around 250 firms might seek accreditation from the ICAEW: 150 sole practitioners, who would have authorised firm status, and 100 larger practices, most of whom would look to become ABSs.

Allowing the institute to accredit accountancy firms to conduct probate work “should drive various benefits for consumers in terms of an increased availability of services nationally, lower prices and efficiencies in service delivery”, it said.

The application allows for non-accountants to seek regulation by the ICAEW, but said “we expect that in the main firms will be accountancy-led”. It continued: “Few firms responding to the survey indicated a clear intention to employ solicitors or other legally qualified staff to carry out probate work.

“Around half of the larger firms of two or more principals that responded said that they were unsure, with over a third indicating that solicitors would not be employed. This possibly implies that firms will look to current members of staff to become accredited for probate, rather than taking on additional legal professionals to deliver these services.”

To become individually authorised, accountants will have to undertake a three and a half day course under the plans, with the ICAEW saying that their existing training, combined with the “relatively straightforward” nature of non-contentious probate work, means it does not need to require “detailed study of the laws governing wills, probate and estate administration”.

The ICAEW will not authorise firms or individuals to conduct estate administration but will regulate such work where conducted by an accredited probate firm. It will also not impose restrictions or conditions on the non-reserved activities an accredited firm may carry out. The Legal Services Board is currently working on making estate administration and will-writing reserved legal activities.

Vernon Soare, ICAEW executive director of professional standards, said: “Following the public consultation and subject to the due process prescribed in the Legal Services Act, we hope to authorise firms for probate and to license ABS within 12 months.

“The decision whether to become a provider of legal services and/or change to an ABS is for ICAEW members and firms to consider. We have developed guidance to help firms in making this decision.”

 

Tags:




    Readers Comments

  • whitegates says:

    Its time that Solicitors got much more savvy about tax and accounting so they could start offering these services too to compete with accountants. I’m studying AAT at present on a part time basis and then this fast tracks me on to full ICAEW qualification, in all taking approx 3/4 years.
    It enhances my legal practice too.

  • Ian K says:

    Three and a half days training before they launch themselves onto the demanding public. They have got to be kidding. There is a lot more to non contentious probate work than some people imagine.Some of them are going to experience a sharp learning curve and one or two bloody noses.

  • Joe Reevy says:

    The worst-kept secret in the UK! I have mentioned this twice (at least) in the Law Management and Marketing newsletter and course providers (operating ICAEW accredited and marketed courses) have been giving courses on this for ages stressing:
    a) that almost all the charged-for work in administering an estate can be done by ICAEW members now and
    b) that it is just a matter of time before the ICAEW was given the necessary powers.
    Worse stiill, as long ago as October 2010 I met by first partner in an ICAEW firm who had administered an estate free form start to dinish in order to create the necessary documents and work out the necessary procedures so he could implement the most efficient possible system as soon as allowed. he reckoned, by the way, that he could undercut law firms by about 50% , but would only do so by 25%, keeping the rest as extra profit.


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Use the tools available to stop doing the work you shouldn’t be doing anyway

We are increasingly taken for granted in the world of Do It Yourself, in which we’re required to do some of the work we have ostensibly paid for, such as in banking, travel and technology


Quality indicators – peer recommendations over review websites

I often feel that I am banging the SRA’s drum for them when it comes to transparency but it’s because I genuinely believe in clarity when it comes to promoting quality professional services.


Embracing the future: Navigating AI in litigation

Whilst the UK courts have shown resistance to change over time, in the past decade they have embraced the use of some technologies that naturally improve efficiency. Now we’re in the age of AI.


Loading animation