Herbert Smith paralegal banned for fake overtime approval


Herbert Smith Freehills: Paralegal dismissed

A former paralegal at City giant Herbert Smith Freehills has been banned from the solicitors’ profession after submitting multiple overtime claims with fake approvals on them.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) said that Catherine Margaret Hunt should not be employed by another law firm except in accordance with its prior permission, under section 43 of the Solicitors Act 1974.

A notice published on Friday said Ms Hunt worked as a paralegal in the firm’s disputes department for just over seven years to January 2019.

Over the course of 10 weeks in autumn 2018, she submitted nine overtime claim forms for a total of 260 hours to the payroll department.

Herbert Smith became concerned that the claims were “unusually high”. Its overtime policy required a manager to approve and initial completed overtime claim forms, and Ms Hunt’s were initialled ‘AL’, who was a former manager.

The manager told the firm that they had not approved any overtime for Ms Hunt or initialled the overtime forms.

Ms Hunt was dismissed for gross misconduct and reported to the SRA. She admitted to the regulator that she had signed the initials and that her conduct was dishonest.

In deciding a section 43 order was appropriate, the SRA said: “Ms Hunt’s conduct makes it undesirable for her to be involved in a legal practice because it was dishonest.

“The public, the profession and others are entitled to rely upon the honesty and integrity of the people that they deal with at solicitors’ firms. Ms Hunt’s actions have undermined trust in the provision of legal services and the solicitors’ profession.”

She was also ordered to pay costs of £300.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


You win some, you lose some – class actions post Google

In November, Google received two court rulings, through which it both closed and opened the door to class actions against it. So what do the decisions mean for future class actions?


Clinical negligence, a changing market – part 1

The consolidation of law firms through merger and acquisition has resulted in fewer, but more sophisticated and expert clinical negligence practices.


How to set your law firm up for success in 2022

At this time of year, law firms around the country are busy strategising and implementing plans for the coming 12 months. Forward-planning is a crucial part of a firm’s success, but where to start?


Loading animation