Heavy-hitting sports law firm becomes ABS

Print This Post

22 December 2017


Lowen: ABS will make firm nimble

A boutique London sports and entertainment law practice has converted to an alternative business structure (ABS) just three months after launching itself, with the aim of being more “nimble” in future.

Level Law, which was set up by four prominent sports lawyers in October, represents the likes of retired Olympic champion Usain Bolt, four-times Tour de France winner Chris Froome – who is currently fighting an ‘adverse’ drugs test  – and heavyweight boxing champion Anthony Joshua.

The ABS received its licence from the Solicitors Regulation Authority earlier this month. Partner Dan Lowen is head of legal practice and of finance and administration.

Mr Lowen, formerly a partner at Couchmans,  launched the firm with fellow senior Couchmans colleagues Fraser Reid and Dan Harrington and ex-Keystone Law partner Morris Bentata, who is also a director of the British Association for Sport and Law.

Mr Lowen and Mr Bentata were previously solicitors at Bird & Bird together. When Level Law launched, it made a virtue of its lack of junior lawyers and back-office staff, which it said meant it had “none of the constraints and overheads associated with traditional private practice”.

Mr Lowen told Legal Futures he hoped other senior solicitors from sports, media and entertainment would join Level: “We are structured as a new, streamlined law firm so the aim is to provide a platform for… lawyers who are of a sufficient level of expertise and seniority [and] who want… to service clients without the constraints and distractions of a traditional legal practice.”

He said that along with world-renowned sportspeople in a “stellar client base”, the firm had as clients “a host of world governing bodies, sports federations, national federations, rights agencies, leagues, clubs, teams, and sponsors”.

He added that Level’s offering was “nimble” compared to traditional law firms which had “sizeable fixed costs”.

The ABS would give flexibility, he said: “We felt it was the right regulatory basis on which to move forwards, being able to act swiftly in the future should the need arise.”

Tags:



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Small claims 2013 v 2018: What has changed?

Brett Dixon APIL

Successive governments have considered increasing the small claims limit for personal injury claims, at the behest of the insurance industry lobby, from £1,000 to £5,000. But the lower limit remains unchanged because, so far, evidence and reasoning have prevailed. The last time the government tried to implement an increase was in 2013 when it concluded that it would keep the issue under consideration for implementation “when appropriate”. Nothing has happened to suppose a small claims limit of £5,000 is any more “appropriate” in 2018 than it was in 2013.

January 15th, 2018