Hacking of top law firms for inside information “a wake-up call to lawyers around the world”


Bharara: law firms are targets of cyber hacking

The case of three men charged with insider trading based on information they hacked from prominent US law firms “should serve as a wake-up call for law firms around the world”, a New York prosecutor has said.

According to the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Preet Bharara, they targeted at least seven unnamed law firms as well as other entities in an effort to unlawfully obtain valuable confidential and proprietary information.

He said that between April 2014 and late 2015, the trio – all from China – were successful in hacking at least two firms by unlawfully obtaining the credentials of employees and then installing malware on the firms’ web servers.

They are also alleged to have repeatedly tried to hack the other five firms in a similar way. Between March and September 2015, for example, they tried to do so no fewer than 100,000 times.

Having obtained access to the law firms’ networks, the defendants are accused of targeting email accounts of law firm partners who worked on high-profile M&A transactions – involving the likes of Intel and Pitney Bowes – and downloading many gigabytes of information.

They are said to have bought shares in at least five publicly-traded companies before the announcements of their acquisition, and then sold the shares for profits of more than $4m.

In each case, one of the two infiltrated law firms represented either the target or a contemplated or actual acquirer in the transaction.

Mr Bharara said: “This case of cyber meets securities fraud should serve as a wake-up call for law firms around the world: you are and will be targets of cyber hacking, because you have information valuable to would-be criminals.”




Blog


The SRA and privileged material – this is not the end

All disclosure to the SRA must now exclude privileged material, which will not only hamper investigations but also cause additional work for firms providing disclosure.


Legal Ombudsman fee reforms risk widening the justice gap

Charging firms simply because a complaint moves through the process weakens the present connection between fees and fault. It could also encourage firms to settle for commercial reasons.


Why upfront information could transform home buying

The success of upfront property information will depend on more than simply making the information available.


Loading animation