Gunnercooke-backed Ignition Law launches with start-ups and SMEs in its sights

Print This Post

22 January 2015

David Farquarson

Farquharson: Becoming part of the ‘commercial team’

A new firm which aims to break the mould of advice to start-ups and SMEs by recruiting lawyers who run their own businesses has opened in London.

David Farquharson, co-founder of Ignition Law, said the business would operate as a trading name of ‘virtual firm’ and alternative business structure gunnercooke and would share its offices in London.

Mr Farquharson, former head of corporate and commercial at Swan Turton, said around 40% of the firm’s clients were start-ups, which he hopes to increase to 50%, and the rest were “SMEs that are going somewhere”.

He went on: “They may have an interesting idea and it may be that lawyers haven’t understood them, or that they haven’t fitted in with the traditional model of a law firm.”

As well as its main office in London, he said Ignition Law would have a base at a ‘start-up campus’ in Shoreditch, east London, where many tech companies are based.

“It helps to be where new start-ups and tech companies are present, and makes us part of the commercial team rather than dipping in and out as traditional law firms do.”

The firm will offer corporate, commercial and employment advice and Mr Farquharson said that where it was able to “scope out” how much a piece of work would cost, it would “definitely offer a fixed fee”.

He said co-founder Alex Mc Pherson, former senior associate at Hogan Lovells, had created four successful start-ups, including the educational advice site sucedo, which aims to help students get into Oxbridge universities.

Mr Farquharson said the firm employed two ‘counsel’ on a freelance basis – Robert Stevenson, a former associate at Hogan Lovells , who runs a ‘virtual medical practice’, and Siriana Kress, a former senior associate at Allen & Overy and a mother returning to work

There is also a heavyweight advisory board comprising John Manser, chairman of the FTSE-100 brewing group SABMiller, former Deloitte managing partner John Shawyer, and Jan Sramek, CEO of software start-up Better.

The firm was particularly targeting lawyers running their own businesses or mothers returning to work in the search for new recruits, Mr Farquharson said. “If you’re running your own start-up business, it is clear that you have a passion and you understand start-ups.”

Mr Farquharson added that the legal market had “not yet experienced the technological and client-friendly disruption under way in other industries”.

He described setting up the law firm as “exhilarating in many ways but quite scary”.

Sarah Goulbourne, partner and co-founder of gunnercooke, said her firm’s “back-office team and technology” was at the disposal of Ignition Law and they would continue to share experience “to benefit both businesses”. Gunnercooke lawyers would also be called on where needed.

“When Ignition approach us with the idea, it seemed a very natural fit,” she said. It was decided to use the separate brand as a way to target the tech market.

Tags: , , ,

One Response to “Gunnercooke-backed Ignition Law launches with start-ups and SMEs in its sights”

  1. It’s a great concept and clearly they have thought about the right team and PR message but there remains a fundamental problem with most start ups – they don’t have much money and don’t want to spend what they have with lawyers. I am generalising somewhat, there is the “cherry picking” approach of possibly subsidising clients. Outwith that, just having better technology and saving a bit like that still perhaps isn’t the answer to the huge start up market and sme which don’t use lawyers …

  2. David Swede on January 22nd, 2015 at 11:12 am

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

How to make a case to the unconverted

Jonathan Whittle

The prospect of change is a daunting one, whether you’re a global firm or a small one. You might think that your firm’s working practices are fine, or that there’s no value in altering the way you do things because of the disruption it would cause. You might even see the benefits of using a different methodology, but still refuse to put the effort in to implement it – and you wouldn’t be alone. From our research in the 2016 report, The Riddle of Perception, we know that 73% of lawyers believe that adapting to change is not where their strength lies. However, it’s no longer optional.

November 16th, 2017