Global lawtech study questions long-term impact of hackathons

India: community-level app

Technology in use around the word to enable legal empowerment – helping ordinary people exercise their legal rights – is often only effective after false starts, while hackathons often do not see follow-through, according to a massive global study.

The research report – believed to be the first of its kind – found the involvement of a mixture of lawyers and non-lawyers, for-profit and non-profit organisations, static information-only sources and dynamic ‘guided pathways’.

In common with smaller-scale access to justice studies, it found that people often were unaware their problem was a legal one and did not attempt to solve it all, or sought help from family or friends rather than from lawyers or courts.

Technology for legal empowerment – a global review, was conducted by US-based community research charity The Engine Room, and commissioned by the Open Society Justice Initiative. It looked at 136 initiatives worldwide and interviewed more than 50 people, covering jurisdictions with widely varying justice systems.

In key findings, the report found organisations best used technology to supplement in-person support, rather than create applications detached from the justice system, “whether by making access to community paralegals easier, or reducing barriers to accessing lawyers”.

Secondly, almost every initiative had to be adjusted after in-depth user research led them “to conclusions they did not expect”. This took time and favoured projects with patient funders or business models that allowed them to experiment.

The report also found that “most” initiatives were being implemented “without an awareness of comparable projects outside their country”. This awareness was hampered by differences between countries in connectivity, infrastructure and legal restrictions.

In a conclusion that raised questions about the long-term effectiveness of hackathons and innovations that were welcomed with fanfare at the time, the report found “many technology-enabled initiatives focused on access to justice that became inactive soon after their launch, with little documentation for the reasons behind… their failure”.

Projects from the developing world examined in the report in detail included PLP 2.0, a Brazilian app aimed at vulnerable women subjected to domestic violence, which connects them to local authorities and a network of paralegals.

Another case study was lawyers2farmers in Uganda, which provides legal information and advice by SMS text message and WhatsApp. It has some 1,460 indigent farmers – three-quarters of them women – and was founded in 2017 by Hellen Mukass, a lawyer who noticed that farmers in her family were asking simple legal questions.

Lastly, Haqdarshak in India, a smartphone app, helps community-level advisers assess individuals’ eligibility for benefits.

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


How can law firms adapt to post-pandemic working?

As law firms emerge from the pandemic, they face the challenges of coping with its aftermath while settling on new ways of working in the long-term.

The hot graphic design trends in the legal sector

As we recover from an unprecedented 19 months within our sector, marketing teams and clerks’ rooms are keener than ever to try out something new in the promotion of their businesses.

What challenges will the Bar face in the next five years?

As we look towards the end of 2021 and at how the Bar has adapted to the harsh realities of the pandemic, the question beckons as to what the future holds.

Loading animation