Give paralegals rights of audience “so they can do more legal aid work”

Print This Post

4 January 2018


Doyle: Potential positive impact on access to justice

Paralegals should be given rights of audience to enable them to do more legal aid work, an academic has argued.

Adam Doyle, head of the law and criminology department at the University of East London, said “any future changes to legal aid policy should favour paralegals undertaking a larger amount of the caseload”.

Mr Doyle said the “potential positive impact” of giving paralegals rights of audience in the lower courts, “particularly for access to justice, is undeniable”.

In article for The Conversation UK website, a not-for-profit website partly funded by universities, Mr Doyle said that at a time when cuts to legal aid meant many people could no longer afford expensive legal fees, paralegals should take on more work.

He said the traditional view of a paralegal as “the unskilled version of a solicitor or barrister – doing much of the background paperwork but not representing a client by themselves or undertaking court work” was a “misconception” which “does disservice to the valuable work paralegals undertake”.

Mr Doyle said the Institute of Paralegals estimated that there were 60,000 paralegals working in law firms and growing, with the institute suggesting there may be more paralegals than solicitors working in law firms in a decade’s time.

He said much of this growth was linked to the restrictions on legal aid introduced in 2013, which in turn has led to more litigants in person slowing down the courts.

Mr Doyle said that if paralegals took on more responsibility, they would need a different type of training and universities should be more involved.

“Some universities have already begun to do this – for example, seven universities already run law programmes that enable students to graduate with a diploma from the National Association of Licensed Paralegals.”

Mr Doyle said the introduction of the Solicitors Qualifying Examination (SQE) in 2020 provided an opportunity to embed key areas of paralegal practice “at all levels of an undergraduate degree”, with further development of “scenario-based” learning.

“In particular, this could include developing and assessing verbal skills in a courtroom setting. Such advocacy skills in a paralegal could prove invaluable for clients who can’t afford to hire a lawyer.

“There are calls for paralegals to get their own professional qualification on top of a law degree, but this will depend on how universities and law schools adapt now to the opportunities to adapt their courses.”



3 Responses to “Give paralegals rights of audience “so they can do more legal aid work””

  1. Or…and bear with me here…increase legal aid funding so that qualified lawyers can properly represent those in need of help. Properly funding legal aid means more trainees willing to do the work meaning the system works better for all involved.

  2. Alastair on January 5th, 2018 at 11:15 am
  3. In what way is it beneficial to the public to get representation by less well qualified people? I have no problem if legal execs wish to qualify as sol-advocates or come to the Bar but this article accepts the current demise of legal aid. We need legal aid to be properly available and properly funded with properly trained advocacy experts, not pushing the less well qualified forward to plug the gap.

  4. Mark George Q.C. on January 6th, 2018 at 9:35 am
  5. Of course paralegals should have rights of audience! That is, when they’ve spent years undertaking the training needed to properly represent clients.
    Dumbing down is NOT the answer – whether in law, medicine or education etc etc.

    This is perhaps the most stupid suggestion I’ve EVER heard!

  6. Qualified Barrister with 20+ years experience on January 6th, 2018 at 1:57 pm

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

How best to achieve independent regulation under the Legal Services Act?

Craig Wakeford LSB

Independent regulation gives confidence to consumers, providers, investors and society as a whole that legal services work in the public interest and support the rule of law. The Legal Services Act 2007 does not require all approved regulators to be structurally separate from representative bodies. Instead, the Legal Services Board is required by the Act to produce internal governance rules (IGR) which apply the principle of regulatory independence in legal service regulation. We are currently running a consultation on the IGR which continues until 9 February.

January 19th, 2018