Gina Miller takes on new campaign: wills reform


Miller: Laws must reflect changes in society

Businesswoman Gina Miller has turned to the “outdated” wills legislation in her latest campaign, calling for emergency measures to help people make wills during the Covid-19 crisis.

Ms Miller – who shot to prominence with her challenges to the government’s approach to Brexit – said the government’s failure to make it easier to complete wills at a time of lockdown and social distancing was “shameful”.

The government has resisted easing the signing and witnessing requirements of the Wills Act 1837, despite the surge in demand during the pandemic and the problems of executing wills. Emergency measures have been introduced in Australia, New Zealand and the USA.

Ms Miller has recently set up Messages of Love, a free ‘digital memory box’ to be opened in the event of the owner’s death, and commissioned a survey of 2,085 adults that found 58% did not have a will.

Those belonging to social grades ABC1 were significantly less likely to have a will than those belonging to social grades C2DE – 35% compared to 45% – while 22% of those who have a will said their circumstances have changed since making it.

Nearly half of people supported temporarily allowing audio-visual witnessing or digital signatures (more the former than latter) when completing a will during the pandemic were temporary emergency witnessing laws enacted.

Ms Miller said: “Laws must reflect changes in society and be updated for the internet age we live in. The government has brought in temporary emergency legislation in other areas such as mental health during the pandemic, and we believe the peace of mind, emotional and financial security that can be gained by updating will legislation far outweighs any other concerns.

“This is not about money but people having the peace of mind that their wishes will be followed. It is shameful that this is not being urgently addressed by the government.”

Even without the pandemic, the research found support for being able record a will on video.

The campaign is supported by Baroness Helena Kennedy QC, the prominent human rights advocate. She said: “In situations of serious threat to life, it should be possible for someone to express their wishes verbally and have those wishes recorded in the presence of witnesses, or for voice recognition technology to be used for verification.

“People in extremis may want to give directions as to who should care for their children or receive assets. The law should accommodate this.”

Will-writing software company Arken.legal is also backing Ms Miller. Its head of legal content, Samantha Warner, said: “With the advances in technology, it is now possible to create a robust and comprehensive will remotely, and therefore complying with social distancing. The difficulty is in executing it…

“One area of particular concern to us at the moment is that of how inequitably unmarried couples are treated under the rules of intestacy and how vitally important it is that they should be able to create a valid will.”




    Readers Comments

  • Julie wilson says:

    This woman Gina Miller what up eith her now as she spent out taking the Govement to court what a cheeck

  • Laurence Kingsley says:

    As a retired barrister and solicitor, I agree with you that the Wills Act of 1837 should be temporarily suspended or revised. A couple of months ago I drafted a new will for myself but the coronavirus crisis arose and meant that I could not sign in front of two witnesses who are not beneficiaries.

  • David Dougans says:

    I not nothing about Solicitors. Clearly making a verbal will on your deathbed is open to manipulation and abuse.

    What is she trying to achieve?

    Will writers I have seen wills written by will writers full of errors.

    Friends of mine was written by one they set up a trust unbelievable errors.

  • David Brown says:

    I agree. Laurence I got your drafting prize at bar school in 1986 thanks!

  • Robert says:

    Whilst I agree that the Wills process should be streamlined if its possible, without risk, I do not want this interfering gobby woman anywhere near it. She is not a lawyer, just an interfering busybody living a life of priveledge. She will never be forgiven for trying to subvert a democratic referendum vote on leaving the EU.


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Retrospective or not retrospective, that is the question

As the debate heats up over the Litigation Funding Agreements (Enforceability) Bill, it is crucial to understand what is the true vice in retrospective legislation.


Harnessing the balance of technology and human interaction

In today’s legal landscape, finding the delicate balance between driving efficiency via use of technology and providing a personalised service is paramount to success.


AI’s legal leap: transforming law practice with intelligent tech

Just like in numerous other industries, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in the legal sector is proving to be a game-changer.


Loading animation