Getting it right first time: LeO rolls out new complaints approach

Bulmer: New lay member of OLC

A new operational model for handling complaints, piloted last year by the Legal Ombudsman (LeO), has boosted quality and efficiency, and helped it get “the work right first time”.

LeO said the pilot showed that involving a supervising ombudsman throughout a case “to ensure staff follow the correct process and their reasoning is rational” had improved quality, case progression and timeliness.

A paper for December’s meeting of the Office for Legal Complaints (OLC), which supervises LeO, said testing of the new supervision model started in April 2018.

Having carried out an evaluation, LeO said the new model had “a number of specific benefits”, which justified wider use across the organisation.

Among them were that it “improved quality, case progression and timeliness by getting the work right first time, providing further assurance that outcomes are fair and reasonable”

The model also encouraged agreed outcomes rather than ombudsman decisions, reduced the time spent by experienced ombudsman reviewing and reworking cases, and thus improved the rate of closures per investigator.

However, LeO said there were “risks and constraints” if the model was extended, such as the need to improve the capability of ombudsmen to supervise, while maintaining sufficient support for new starters.

Staff morale could also be a factor, as the ‘supervision model’ could be viewed “negatively as micro-management”, particularly because of its name.

There might also be a negative impact on high complexity cases, which needed high levels of involvement from ombudsmen.

LeO concluded that the findings of the evaluation were “sufficiently compelling” for it to introduce a new ‘quality and feedback’ model in the new financial year, based on an enhanced version of the ‘supervision model’, with greater resources for new starters.

LeO made improving quality its primary focus for 2019-2020 in a consultation on its business plan launched last month.

Wanda Goldwag, chair of the OLC, described LeO’s performance in 2018-19 as “mixed”, but predicted that it would achieve “consistent and sustainable performance” this year.

Meanwhile, Rod Bulmer, who left the Co-op Group last year after 11 years, latterly as director of strategy and renewal planning, has been appointed a lay member of the OLC board.

He is joined by Shrinivas Honap, a member of the board at the Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency, UK Atomic Energy Authority and Office of the Public Guardian. Before that he held senior management roles at Capita, Vodafone and Egg Financial Services.

The time commitment for an OLC board member is estimated at a minimum of 20 days’ a year across their time at the organisation, in return for remuneration of £10,000. The two outgoing lay members of the board are Bernard Herdan and Michael Kaltz.

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


How burnout was my catalyst for serving lawyers instead of being one

As my legal career progressed, I began to realise the reality was very different than I had envisaged. I was in a constant state of stress, working very long hours. I normalised the stress, as it seemed to be everywhere I looked.

Virtual supervision – the modern dilemma

Virtual supervision is important, but it is very important that that supervision doesn’t become virtual, and not fit for purpose. So how do we guard against that?

Loading animation