Gateley narrowly overcomes shareholder pay revolt

Stock exchange: Institutional investors were urged to vote against report

Pioneering listed law firm Gateley narrowly survived a major shareholder revolt against its directors’ remuneration report.

Some 28m votes were against adopting the remuneration report at Friday’s annual general meeting, while a further 1.4m votes were withheld. Nearly 31m were in favour.

In a statement, Gateley said: “The board is aware that, in some cases, such voting was influenced by a report produced by a proxy shareholder services company, which recommended to institutional shareholders that they vote against this resolution.

“The board intends to engage both with the relevant institutional shareholders and the proxy shareholder services company itself to better understand their respective positions, as well as to explain to each why the board believes that the findings in the report are not based upon all of the information which is relevant and are, therefore, inappropriate in this instance.”

It is not clear what the recommendation was or what it was based on.

Gateley cancelled both its interim and final year dividend for 2020 due to Covid-19. Announcing its results in September, the board said its intention was “to re-instate dividend payments at the earliest sensible opportunity and will review its position once the outturn for FY21 is known”.

The UK’s first listed law firm announced a 6% increase in revenue to £110m in the year to 30 April, of which 3.5% was organic and 2.5% from the four acquisitions of complementary non-legal businesses it made during the year.

The remuneration report said that, during the year, the firm implemented and made awards under a new long-term incentive plan (LTIP) for executive directors and selected senior employees, determined salary increases and “incentive outcomes” for the executive directors, and set the arrangements for the new chief executive, Rod Waldie, who took over from Michael Ward on 1 May 2020 – at the same salary of £260,000.

“Salary increases awarded during the year reflect the committee’s intention for executive remuneration to be competitively positioned for the commencement of the 2021 financial year,” it said. Due to Covid, they did not receive any bonuses.

Awards under the LTIP were originally granted to executive directors and other senior employees in February, but these were then cancelled because the earnings per share performance targets were no longer considered achievable given the impact of the pandemic.

It made new LTIP awards in July to the same employees in the same proportions, but 28% more awards were granted overall “to enhance incentivisation during the difficult and challenging economic conditions encountered due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic”.

The board said the targets were considered “appropriately stretching taking into account the current economic environment”.

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Keeping the conversation going beyond Pride Month

As I reflect on all the celebrations of Pride Month 2024, I ask myself why there remains hesitancy amongst LGBTQ+ staff members about when it comes to being open about their identity in the workplace.

Third-party managed accounts: Your key questions answered

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has given strong indications that it is headed towards greater restrictions on law firms when it comes to handling client money.

Understanding vicarious trauma in the legal workplace

Vicarious trauma can happen to anyone who works with clients who have experienced trauma such as domestic or other violence, child abuse, sexual assault, torture or being a refugee.

Loading animation